Imagine What The NewsMediaWould've Found If They Looked, Perhaps This Proof Of Obama's Socialist Party Ties?

All kinds of stuff is pouring out now to conservative bloggers secretly just as it used to be provided to what used to be the media and my feeling is the rest of the world is secretly laughing at the left lemmings as the people Obama hoped would remain silent through the campaign have for the most part.

But, there's a flood of information waiting to surge forward, it already is and it will full speed after he's elected acting to destroy his presidency from the get go making the democrats immediately as toxic to Americans as the republicans presently are to many.

One of Obama's biggest and loudest complaints has been the claim that accidentally leaked out of his own mouth, the accusations by bloggers like me columnists and pundits of his socialist Marxist tendencies he spilled into Joe The Plumber's lap that woke up skeptical Americans to his true goals. But there just wasn't much proof to back up the claims made by us, besides that 4 minute video tape of him and Joe that is, and then the subsequent KGB style beat down and disassembling of Joe's personal life was almost enough proof for most just in the nick of time..

Now here's some more this morning straight from Jerusalem...

Newspaper shows Obama belonged to socialist party:

"JERUSALEM – Evidence has emerged that Sen. Barack Obama belonged to a socialist political party that sought to elect members to public office with the aim of moving the Democratic Party far leftward to ultimately form a new political party with a socialist agenda.

Several blogs, including Powerline, previously documented that while running for the Illinois state Senate in 1996 as a Democrat, Obama actively sought and received the endorsement of the socialist-oriented New Party, with some blogs claiming Obama was a member of the controversial party.

The New Party, formed by members of the Democratic Socialists for America and leaders of an offshoot of the Community Party USA, was an electoral alliance that worked alongside the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN. The New Party's aim was to help elect politicians to office who espouse its policies.

Among New Party members was linguist and radical activist Noam Chomsky.

Obama's campaign has responded to the allegations, denying the presidential candidate was ever a member of the New Party." continued

---

Start The Violin Section For Obama as Full Blown DukakisItis Sets In

The Middle Of The End For The Obama Campaign starts right now

The left is turning on Obama and doing it good. In a month you'll be hard pressed to find anyone who will publicly admit they took a ride on Obama' embarrassing magic carpet this past summer as they all get used to saying President McCain and Vice President Palin.

Why is Obama so vapid, hesitant, and gutless? -

By Christopher Hitchens - Slate Magazine: "Last week really ought to have been the end of the McCain campaign. With the whole country feeling (and its financial class acting) as if we lived in a sweltering, bankrupt banana republic, and with this misery added to the generally Belarusian atmosphere that surrounds any American trying to board a train, catch a plane, fill a prescription, or get a public servant or private practitioner on the phone, it was surely the moment for the supposedly reform candidate to assume a commanding position.

And the Republican nominee virtually volunteered to assist that outcome by making an idiot of himself several times over, moving from bovine and Panglossian serenity about the state of the many, many crippled markets to sudden bursts of pointless hyperactivity such as the irrelevant demand to sack the chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission."

And yet, and unless I am about to miss some delayed "groundswell" or mood shift, none of this has translated into any measurable advantage for the Democrat. There are three possible reasons for such a huge failure on Barack Obama's part. The first, and the most widely canvassed, is that he is too nice, too innocent, too honest, and too decent to get down in the arena and trade bloody thrusts with the right-wing enemy. (This is rapidly becoming the story line that will achieve mythic status, along with allegations of racial and religious rumor-mongering, if he actually loses in November.) The second is that crisis and difficulty, at home and abroad, sometimes make electors slightly more likely to trust the existing establishment, or some version of it, than any challenger or newcomer, however slight.

The third is that Obama does not, and perhaps even cannot, represent "change" for the very simple reason that the Democrats are a status quo party.

I'll take door number three for $5000 Chris as it is status quo full bore for the so called party of change , the mantle which was stolen right from under their jew hating noses by John McCain and will drive him right to Pennsylvania avenue in a few weeks/ .

---

To Drill Or Not To Drill, That Is The Question, & Washington Dems Have the Answer...

That's a big hairy Nancy Pelosi led NO, NO, NO, NO, Hell No.

And off she and her comrades go again for another breakski from Washington after taking the entire month of August off to peddle their books (San Fran Nan), chum around with the Messiah, get ready for the Brakopolous World Tour 2008 and fiddle like Nero while we all paid and continue to pay record high gas prices in the face of this mounting economic chaos, and these audacious libs keep pouring gasoline on the fire all in hopes of aiding their re election bids and increasing Obama's chances in November at our expense.

All so they can head home and try to figure out how their gonna con their way back into congress and the senate without having to address why they continue to shove figurative oil rigs up the a**es of their constituents, we the people, in order to keep gas prices high as they can be, mistakenly thinking that we're all so stupid we'll all somehow blame the party of Oil Man ChimpyBushitler along with Dr Death Cheney, those mean old oil tyrants and barons they claim only cares about oil, ya know, no war for oil and all that jazz........... remember that? How the hell could we forget?

Drilling for cover: Pelosi & Co.'s phony bill

UnionLeader.com - New Hampshire news, business and sports - - Thursday, Sep. 18, 2008: "Democrats in the U.S. House want you to think that they support expanded drilling for oil and natural gas. They don't. Their vote on Tuesday proved it.

New Hampshire Reps. Carol Shea-Porter and Paul Hodes voted along with the rest of Speaker Nancy Pelosi's poodle army for what they claim is a comprehensive energy bill that responsibly expands domestic drilling off our coasts. In the Atlantic and Pacific, the bill allows drilling from 100 to 200 miles offshore. It allows drilling from 50 to 100 miles offshore with state approval. The eastern Gulf of Mexico would remain off limits.

Under the bill, all land within 50 miles of shore would remain off limits. Oh, by the way, the Interior Department says that 88 percent of all offshore oil currently blocked by the federal drilling ban is located within 50 miles of shore.

This bill is a total fraud. It gives us access to only 12 percent of the estimated oil reserves we are currently not allowed to access. If Congress takes no action in the next two weeks, guess how much of that oil we could tap? One hundred percent. continued

---

"I am Not A Muslim, I am Not A Muslim", Says Barack Over and Over

However, we on this blog and millions of other educated readers, bloggers and patriotic citizens know the truth to be otherwise, and have been fighting for 1 year now to enlighten Americans who either choose to ignore truth when it's staring them right in the face or are simply ignorant due to an inability to read, or comprehend what they read.

Another group would be in the case of die hard, fanatical, BDS infected Daily Kos reader types who would rather see their country weakened if not destroyed completely, if they cannot have their way while having to admit they could are wrong, as they are in their want and pathetic need to elect Barack Hussein Obama II president of the United States in spite of the encyclopedia's worth of valid reasons for him to be disqualified from the office.

How about the reason stated in the post title that he has been parroting the entire campaign when in fact Obama may not be a Muslim by his definition but by Muslim definition he is as is his entire Paternal family.

"'In Islam, religion passes from the father to the child. Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. [his Kenyan birth father] was a Muslim who named his boy Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. Only Muslim children are named 'Hussein'.… [Barack Obama's] stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, was also a Muslim. In fact, as Obama's half-sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng explained to Jodi Kantor of the New York Times: 'My whole family was Muslim, and most of the people I knew were Muslim.' An Indonesian publication, the Banjarmasin Post reports a former classmate, Rony Amir, recalling that 'All the relatives of Barry's [Barack's] father were very devout Muslims.''"

---

Dems Licking Their Chops Over This If They Capture White House

That's the so called "Fairness Doctrine", something so blatantly unfair only Democrats could name it that.

Bringing an abrupt and certain end to free speech over the radio airwaves that has flourished during the Bush administration it will likely be reconstituted under a socialist Obama or Clinton presidency, since the only headway the Democrats have managed in the realm of talk radio over the past decade is the gross failure called Air America. However they do have a stranglehold on the other 90% of the media out there, so as good socialists they must claim the remaining 10%.

Bush gave a speech today promising to veto any legislation coming his way, but what happens after January 2009 is anyones guess right now, even with McCain in the running. After all, he's not exactly a chum of the talk radio crowd unless he does some serious bootlicking over the next 7 months.

Bush: ‘Fairness Doctrine’ unfair

Austin American-Statesman | Window on Washington: "In Nashville today, during a speech to the National Religious Broadcasters Convention, President Bush said there’s nothing fair about the so-called “Fairness Doctrine” that once required broadcasters to offer air time for competing ideologies.

The FCC got rid of it about 20 years ago. Now, some Democrats in Congress - long the target of popular conservative radio talk-show hosts - think it’s time to bring it back.

Perish the thought, Bush told the religious broadcasters in the following passage that ends with a veto promise.

“This organization has had many important missions, but none more important than ensuring our airways - America’s airways - stay open to those who preach the ‘Good News.’ The very first amendment to our Constitution includes the freedom of speech and the freedom of religion. Founders believed these unalienable rights were endowed to us by our Creator. They are vital to a healthy democracy, and we must never let anyone take those freedoms away.”

” I mention this because there’s an effort afoot that would jeopardize your right to express your views on public airways. Some members of Congress want to reinstate a regulation that was repealed 20 years ago. It has the Orwellian name called the Fairness Doctrine. Supporters of this regulation say we need to mandate that any discussion of so-called controversial issues on the public airwaves includes equal time for all sides. This means that many programs wanting to stay on the air would have to meet Washington’s definition of balance. Of course, for some in Washington, the only opinions that require balancing are the ones they don’t like.”

“We know who these advocates of so-called balance really have in their sights: shows hosted by people like Rush Limbaugh or James Dobson, or many of you here today. By insisting on so-called balance, they want to silence those they don’t agree with. The truth of the matter is, they know they cannot prevail in the public debate of ideas. They don’t acknowledge that you are the balance … The country should not be afraid of the diversity of opinions. After all, we’re strengthened by diversity of opinions.”

“If Congress truly supports the free and open exchange of ideas, then there is a way they can demonstrate that right now. Republicans have drafted legislation that would ban reinstatement of the so-called Fairness Doctrine. Unfortunately, Democratic leaders in the House of Representatives have blocked action on this bill. So in response, nearly every Republican in the House has signed onto what’s called a ‘discharge petition,’ that would require Congress to hold an up or down vote on the ban. Supporters of this petition are only 24 signatures away.”

“I do want to thank (Indiana Rep.) Mike Pence, who is with us today, and Congressman Greg Walden (of Oregon), for pressing this effort and defending the right for people to express themselves freely. And I urge other members to join in this discharge petition. But I’ll tell you this: If Congress should ever pass any legislation that stifles your right to express your views, I’m going to veto it.”

---

No Special Treatment As Dems Pray For Mass Latino Vote Influx

Here's a democratic dream if there ever was one should this little demand and plan come fruition prior to the election in November, that being the ramrodded naturalization of hundreds of thousands of Latinos. My question is why just Latinos, what about the hundreds of thousands of Eastern and Western Europeans waiting patiently in line for years to be naturalized Americans the right way?

I say the doors should be closed on Latin American immigration for a while, simply as a penalty for all the Latin American Illegal Immigrants flooding the country on our dime for the past few decades, not rewarding latino communities for breaking our laws with no regard whatsoever for the cost to average Americans with sped up immigration proceedings . Not to even mention then rewarding the democrats with millions of votes to swing the election in November in return for jamming through their paperwork.

This idea is simply ridiculous and this strong armed demand should be met with a resounding NO, not this year or any other folks, as the elections belong to we Americans and no one else, and any newly naturalized Americans should have to wait at least a year before being granted the right to vote just for this very type reason of hopes to swing presidential elections with the votes of misinformed or even uniformed immigrants with no understanding of the issues facing the country other than their own personal wants and needs..

Latinos Seek Citizenship in Time for Voting -

New York Times: "A lawsuit filed Thursday in a federal court in New York by Latino immigrants seeks to force immigration authorities to complete hundreds of thousands of stalled naturalization petitions in time for the new citizens to vote in November.

The class-action suit was brought by the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund on behalf of legal Hispanic immigrants in the New York City area who are eager to vote and have been waiting for years for the federal Citizenship and Immigration Services agency to finish their applications. The suit demands that the agency meet a nationwide deadline of Sept. 22 to complete any naturalization petitions filed by March 26."

Latino groups hope to summon the clout of the federal courts to compel the Bush administration to reduce a backlog of citizenship applications that swelled last year. According to the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan research group in Washington, more than one million citizenship petitions were backed up in the pipeline by the end of December, the majority from Latino immigrants.

Despite protests over the delays from lawmakers, Latino groups and immigrant advocates, the immigration agency is currently projecting wait times of 16 months to 18 months to process the petitions.

“The reality is that large numbers of Latinos will not be able to vote in the elections because of these delays,” said Cesar A. Perales, president of the defense fund. “Now the world will know that the Latino community expects the Bush administration to get this done on time.”

Christopher S. Bentley, a spokesman for Citizenship and Immigration Services, said he could not comment on pending litigation.

“Our commitment is to work through the naturalization applications as quickly as we can without compromising the security and integrity of the process,” Mr. Bentley said.

The lawsuit, filed in the Southern District of New York, asserts that the agency violated immigrants’ due process rights by routinely failing to finish their applications within a 180-day time period that Congress has set as a standard. It also asserts that the Bush administration did not follow regulatory procedures in November 2002 when it ordered the Federal Bureau of Investigation to deepen its background checks of citizenship applicants. continued

---

McCain Makes More Enemies After Cunningham Rebuke

And at the moment I may have just become one of them as I was just beginning to warm up a bit to the prospect of having to pull the lever for him in November over my other 4 choices ahead off him, and a little part of that is because of the talk show host who's show I listen to regularly on Sunday nights.

McCain really showed his true deep down liberal colors yesterday by throwing Cunningham in front of his Straight Talk Express bus per se yesterday because of his repeated use of this apparent common slur (sarc on), 'HIS MIDDLE NAME HUSSEIN" as Cunningham opened up his rally yesterday with exactly what McCain's people asked for, red meat for the crowd to which they favorably responded to by the way!!

I've repeatedly stated that this is the first time in my life and in politics when the usage of someone's own name is being characterized as a slur of some sort as was indicated yesterday by the big liberal flap generated over Cunningham's genuine attempts at reminding voters of who this man is and where he comes from, two plus generations of Muslim heritage (father & grandfather then it becomes unclear) is what the obvious connotation is and deservedly so one would think after 9-11..

If this is something that is of some embarrassment or shame for Obama then he as should his liberal sycophants in the mediashould come forward and explain to Americans exactly why it is that being referred to by his full given birth name is offensive and considered a slur of some sort or another. How ridiculous..

Or maybe he should go back to using Barry as he did for part of his life as most are unaware as well.

Meanwhile, John McCain may have cost himself some very valuable supporters and voices out here in the blogosphere and in radio land after his spineless kiss up to Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama at Bill Cunningham's expense.

McCain Repudiates Hussein Obama Remarks

The Caucus - Politics - New York Times Blog: "CINCINNATI, Ohio—A conservative radio talk show host who helped introduce Senator John McCain before a rally here Tuesday used Senator Barack Obama’s middle name, Hussein, three times, while disparaging him, prompting Mr. McCain to apologize and repudiate the comments afterward.

Bill Cunningham, who hosts “The Big Show” with Bill Cunningham, a local program here that is also syndicated nationally, was part of a line of people lauding Mr. McCain and revving up the crowd before his appearance here before several hundred people at a theater here.

He lambasted the national media, drawing cheers from the audience, for being soft in their coverage of Mr. Obama compared to the Republican candidates, declaring they should “peel the bark off Barack Hussein Obama.”

He went on to rail, “at one point, the media will quit taking sides in this thing and start covering Barack Hussein Obama.”

After Mr. Cunningham spoke, Congressman Rob Portman, an Ohio Republican, took the stage and introduced Mr. McCain, who spoke for about a half hour. Neither commented about Mr. Cunningham’s remarks.

Mr. Portman said: “Willie, you’re out of control again. So, what else is new? But we love him. But I’ve got to tell you, Bill Cunningham lending his voice to this campaign is extremely important. He did it in 2000, he did it in 2004, it was crucial to victory then and it’s even more important this year with his bigger radio audience. So Bill Cunningham thank you for lending your voice.”

Afterward, however, Mr. McCain held a scheduled news conference and immediately addressed the comments, evidently informed by his aides about what had happened.

“It’s my understanding that before I came in here a person who was on the program before I spoke made some disparaging remarks about my two colleagues in the Senate, Senator Obama and Senator Clinton,” he said. “I have repeatedly stated my respect for Senator Obama and Senator Clinton, that I will treat them with respect. I will call them ‘Senator.’ We will have a respectful debate, as I have said on hundreds of occasions. I regret any comments that may have been made about these two individuals who are honorable Americans.” continued

---

McCain Kisses Up To Liberals & Obama Campaign Today

On MSNBC a report came across that I caught on the web regarding radio host Bill Cunningham, who I listen to on Sunday nights referring to Barack Hussein Obama as exactly that, Barack Hussein Obama warming up a crowd today before a McCain rally, something he does with regularity on his radio show which I personally find no problem with.

After all, it's his middle name, and if he finds it so offensive being referred to by his full name I find something terribly wrong and offensive with that as should the American public. Never in my life have I heard of someone being referred to in their full name as an offensive slur!!! F'kng ridiculous.

John McCain, the liberal kissup that he is, quickly caved when confronted upon his arrival at the stop apologized profusely for Cunningham's supposedly offensive remarks referring to Hussein Obama as,well Barack Hussein Obama, his name for cripesake..

This is another reason why John McCain sucks as our candidate this fall, his propensity to suck up to liberals in a heartbeat on many issues dear to conservatives, and this is one of hem as well.

MSNBC, particularly the nimrod Keith Olbermann on his barely watched nightly liberal television circus constantly whines and cries about Cunningham using this tact when talking about Obama on his radio show as did Dan Abrahms, another Obama sycophant apparently in his report this afternoon that they replaced on the web with that lame brained Andrea Mitchell's report instead.


In response to this report I fired off this email to Dan Abrahms basically reiterating what I said above in a more condensed form regarding his report:

I would like to know what exactly is so offensive as you ridiculously imply on your show this afternoon by Bill Cunningham referring to Barack Hussein Obama as Barack Hussein Obama? It's his damn name and if you ask me, there's something wrong with a candidate who's ashamed of his middle name, don't you think? I sure as heck do. And John McCain is spineless for apologizing on demand as well, and that's why he sucks as our republican candidate, he kisses up to liberals and his opponent whenever confronted with a choice to do so.

We are in big trouble this fall and this country will suffer permanent damage as a result of electing a Muslim candidate who gets elected by running from and hiding his Muslim heritage from the electorate with the help of a complicit media who is afraid to confront the subject as well for fear of being branded racists for reporting the truth.

Here are the liberal responses googled on the web today to this event as the whole left defends a candidate who is ashamed to be introduced by his middle name at speaking engagements and in public. Pathetic.

---

A Reason For Scrutiny Regarding U.S. Mosques?

There are quite a few reasons for such activity and this study below indicates the biggest one; that most mosques within the United States preach hate directed at the west and particularly to their host country, US.

They continuously and effectively twist and turn our freedoms and laws on their head in order to use them against the country and it's citizens, you and I in their ultimate quest of turning the US into an Islamic based country utilizing sharia law. And a big step in that direction will take place if Barack Hussein Obama is elected president you can bet as his soft heartedness towards Islam is no secret and just in case you think that isn't true, look at this picture taken not too long ago on a visit to the mideast and Africa:

I posted this photo 6 hours before Drudge did this morning by the way,

Nice outfit for the next president of the United States of America...You have never seen a US president dressed in the clothes of the enemy while at war, and the cloth of the very people that brought down the trade centers on 9-11.

"Obamination" is certainly right on target, and our blessed forefathers who's hard work, sacrifice and foresight gave us this blessed nation to safeguard will be spinning in their poor graves if and when this Muslim man manages to get elected somehow, and thereafter this then God forsaken country will get exactly what it deserves for allowing such a dreaded circumstance to occur on our watch, as opposed to electing true American patriot and unquestioned war hero like John McCain.

Yes he may not be exactly what many of we conservatives were hoping for but compared to Obama he's a Godsend. What a crock.

Study: 3 in 4 U.S. mosques preach anti-West extremism:

WorldNetDaily "An undercover survey of more than 100 mosques and Islamic schools in America has exposed widespread radicalism, including the alarming finding that 3 in 4 Islamic centers are hotbeds of anti-Western extremism, WND has learned."

The Mapping Sharia in America Project, sponsored by the Washington-based Center for Security Policy, has trained former counterintelligence and counterterrorism agents from the FBI, CIA and U.S. military, who are skilled in Arabic and Urdu, to conduct undercover reconnaissance at some 2,300 mosques and Islamic centers and schools across the country.

"So far of 100 mapped, 75 should be on a watchlist," an official familiar with the project said.

Many of the Islamic centers are operating under the auspices of the Saudi Arabian government and U.S. front groups for the radical Muslim Brotherhood based in Egypt.

Frank Gaffney, a former Pentagon official who runs the Center for Security Policy, says the results of the survey have not yet been published. But he confirmed that "the vast majority" are inciting insurrection and jihad through sermons by Saudi-trained imams and anti-Western literature, videos and textbooks.

The project, headed by David Yerushalmi, a lawyer and expert on sharia law, has finished collecting data from the first cohort of 102 mosques and schools. Preliminary findings indicate that almost 80 percent of the group exhibit a high level of sharia-compliance and jihadi threat, including:

• Ultra-orthodox worship in which women are separated from men in the prayer hall and must enter the mosque from a separate, usually back, entrance; and are required to wear hijabs.

• Sermons that preach women are inferior to men and can be beaten for disobedience; that non-Muslims, particularly Jews, are infidels and inferior to Muslims; that jihad or support of jihad is not only a Muslim's duty but the noblest way, and suicide bombers and other so-called "martyrs" are worthy of the highest praise; and that an Islamic caliphate should one day encompass the U.S.

• Solicitation of financial support for jihad.

• Bookstores that sell books, CDs and DVDs promoting jihad and glorifying martyrdom.

Though not all mosques in America are radicalized, many have tended to serve as safe havens and meeting points for Islamic terrorist groups. Experts say there are at least 40 episodes of extremists and terrorists being connected to mosques in the past decade alone. continued

Speaking of Barack Obama and Radical Islam, The leader of the Nation of Islam, about as radical group of Americans as they come, and when one speaks of racism there is no second fiddle to Louis Farrakhan, who spent the past weekend here in Chicago's McCormick place singing the praises of Barack Hussein hoping for a position is his cabinet should he miraculously be elected this November.

The Jew and Caucasian hating Louis, the recipient of the Lifetime Achievement award from Obama's mentor, the so called Reverend Wright of the Trinity church also in Chicago spent 2 hours denigrating whites while professing that Obama is just what America needs after 230 years of ruin from the white man.

What a guy, maybe Obama can take him around the country for a few months to show America the kind of people he truly represents and what his real vision for America is.

A Spry Farrakhan Sings Obama's Praises:

"CHICAGO (AP) - In his first major public address since a cancer crisis, Nation of Islam Minister Louis Farrakhan said Sunday that presidential candidate Barack Obama is the 'hope of the entire world' that the U.S. will change for the better.

The 74-year-old Farrakhan, addressing an estimated crowd of 20,000 people at the annual Saviours' Day celebration, never outrightly endorsed Obama but spent most of the nearly two-hour speech praising the Illinois senator.

'This young man is the hope of the entire world that America will change and be made better,' he said. 'This young man is capturing audiences of black and brown and red and yellow. If you look at Barack Obama's audiences and look at the effect of his words, those people are being transformed.'"

---

When Will The MSM Touch On This Subject?

That being the religious radicals that Barack likes to hang out with on many Sundays here in Chicago, participating and belonging to a church assemblage that is certainly far from the mainstream and teeters on the verge of being a radical hate cult by many American peoples standards.

Then of coarse we know most liberals have no standards and therefore are simply unaffected by this revelation but many others will not be if they are ever informed of this relationship by the sycophant Obama a**kissing media.

Barack's Mentor, the Radical Rev Wright

Obama's disturbing Africentrism: "By Floyd and Mary Beth Brown

WorldNetDaily Saturday: Barack Obama's church, Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago (radical website here), which he has attended since 1991, has some very unique and disturbing ideas and beliefs. It is a self-proclaimed Africentric Christian church, which means its members embrace their connection with Africa, and its teachings are centered on all things African and African culture.

"This is the church where Obama converted to the Christian faith, and it has now grown to over 5,000 members. The mainstream media have ignored discussing this important influence on the presumptive Democratic nominee. It needs a full examination.

Africentric beliefs place an emphasis on identifying African presence in the Bible. The church offers classes in Swahili, and it has youth programs for young men and women, Intonjane and Isuthu, Swahili words for entering manhood and womanhood. Kwanzaa, the African-focused holiday created in the 1960s is observed by congregants along with a Thanksgiving Day service called Umoja Karamu. This special service tells the story of the black family starting from its West African origins to present day using drums, storytelling and dancing.

Trinity emphasizes the African roots of Christianity in its Bible classes. One example they like to use is the story about the Ethiopian eunuch in Acts 8. Traditional African clothing is worn by the pastor and some members. Also, other African symbols such as the pan-African flag are prominently displayed. continued

---

My Only Memory From Last Night's Debate?

Aside of coarse from the usual endless liberal "we are the world saviors" crap emanating from these two candidates in this campaign. I've never seen two presidential candidates with less experience between them that claim to have so much experience in politics that can be disproved with a simple 5 minute google records check.

It's incredible to me that these candidates have gotten so far on so little when there are literally millions and millions of African American and Female Americans more experienced and qualified to be the president of this great country than these two hyperbole masters.

Both are brutally un-notable senators, Obama less noteworthy both the state and the federal level, so I guess that gives him more of less experience than Hill (lol) claims to have, or more years of less and less accomplishments.

I wasn't aware of the fact that occasional pillow talk with the at the time "President/ Rapist in Chief actually qualifies as applicable presidential resume experience mixed in with an absentee landlord senatorial gig up in New York that the voters there allowed her to get away with.

In Obama's case, his experience consists of being a multiple term Illinois state senator who actually registered more present votes on his cumulative watch than yeas or nays combined. Quite easy to navigate the landscape when you cut grass on both sides of the fence. It's amazing to me and millions of others that these simple and yet all important facts are making it through the entire primary selection process without being addressed by the lap licking, liberal leaning and in the tank MSM.

These two candidates of "Change and Hope" (puke) have really cracked the code on how to grease the skids for a senator to the presidency, not an easy to accomplish heat which has never been done before by the way in this country which happens for a reason of coarse.

The easy to explain reason is of coarse that being a Senator or Congressperson usually leaves behind long voting that tend to follow them around, records that will usually disqualify them in one way or another from serving as president due to the inability to satisfy all the different factions of voters that are required in a general election.

And long records are the absolute polar opposite of what these two candidates possess, that's for sure and you can bet that this is no accident, although the Clinton machinery wasn't counting on this "ObamaRama Liberal revival tour" to actually gain traction as it has , nor was anyone else for that matter. That is why this aberration will eventually flame out leaving John McPain as the next president. .

The biggest problem the country has is that we on the right already know most of this to the point of even admitting our own presidential offerings have much to be desired and not making the grade, it's getting the sycophants on the left who are acting as if this is just another season of American Idol, as opposed to an all important presidential election for the most important job on the face of planet earth besides motherhood of coarse, which remarkably the left also considers to be an absentee ownership position as well thanks to the liberal convenience of abortion that is.

So, here is a great OP ED I read in regards to this incredulous "Magical Mystery "of Hillary and Barack explaining what exactly is exactly going on with the liberal electorate and their amazing absent minded acceptance of these two of the least experienced candidates for president that anyone can recollect in recent times:

This good author Brad McDonald calls it...........

"Abdication Of Reason"

theTrumpet.com: "What can we deduce about the state of mind of those who rally, sometimes with remarkable fervor, behind a man they know nothing about?

Abdication of reason.

In the Emory Wheel, the student newspaper of Emory College, Josh Prywes reported, “Pollster Frank Luntz asked college students at a recent focus group to name the candidate they were going to vote for. All of them said Obama, but when Luntz followed up by asking them to name a single accomplishment of the senator, they couldn’t name one. Nobody could name a single accomplishment that Senator Obama has achieved” (emphasis mine throughout).

Can you?

Barack Obama is an unrivaled political sensation, a political phenomenon on pace to become the Democratic nominee for president of the United States.

Senator Obama’s success is spectacular not just for its scale, but for the means by which it has come about. The strategy employed by the Obama campaign, as commentators—including some on the liberal bench—have observed lately, has been one of substituting rhetoric for reason, and style for substance, in an effort to win the hearts of supporters with a syrupy message of change, hope and inspiration. It’s the same style as that adopted by many a Pentecostal preacher, and it seems to be having the same spellbinding results."

"But though the senator’s message of “change” may be enthralling—especially when delivered Obama-style, with a big toothy smile, vibrant body language and the perpetual use of emotionally inclusive language—there is no particular agenda offered for that change, no goal mentioned to hope for, no laid-out strategy. Obama’s message is geared to obtaining one climactic, emotionally inspired action from his enraptured audiences: vote for Obama!

It’s a campaign founded on the abdication of reason in exchange for the embodiment of emotion.

So far, it has worked. In his column last Friday, Charles Krauthammer assembled a disturbing montage of the feverish support behind Senator Obama. Despite the stark contrast “between his broad rhetoric and his narrow agenda,” said Newsweek columnist Robert Samuelson, “the press corps—preoccupied with the political ‘horse race’—has treated his invocation of ‘change’ as a serious idea rather than a shallow campaign slogan. He seems to have hypnotized much of the media and the public with his eloquence and the symbolism of his life story. The result is a mass delusion that Obama is forthrightly engaging the nation’s problems when, so far, he isn’t.”

Keep reading this one, it's good.

---

My Only Memory From Last Night's Debate?

Aside of coarse from the usual endless liberal hyperbolic "We are the World's Saviors" crapola emanating from these two candidate campaigns of "Hope". I keep hoping they will come up with some sort of solid strategy and platforms besides the culture of death and their trusty old Abortion plank.

I guess HOPE only matters for the lucky ones that make it past the abortion window that keeps growing longer and longer thanks to their acceptance of the brutal late term abortions that we cannot seem to get taken off the table. So the unborn have no hope but, what the hell, everyone else can count on Hillary or Barack for Change and Hope. What a crock.

I've personally never seen two presidential candidates with less experience between them that ridiculously continue to claim on the stump to have so much experience in politics, claims that can be disproved with a simple 5 minute google records check that apparently so few liberals are willing to attempt..

It's incredible to me that these candidates have gotten so far on so little when there are literally millions and millions of African American and Female Americans more experienced and qualified to be the president of this great country than these two hyperbole masters.

Both candidates are brutally un-notable senators of minimal Capitol Hill experience, Obama less noteworthy at both the state level and the federal level, so I guess that gives him more of less the one up on experience than Hill (lol) claims to have, or more years of less and less accomplishments to have to disprove.

I personally wasn't aware of the fact that the occasional pillow talk with the at that time "President /Rapist in Chief actually qualified as presidential resume experience, mixed in of coarse with her obligatory absentee landlord senatorial gig up there in New York that the poor residents obliged her with.

Or in Obama's case, that being an Illinois state senator also doing an obligatory self serving stint who actually registered more "present" votes than yea or nay combined for his entire senatorial career in Illinois qualifies as well. It's amazing this is going through the entire primary selection process without being addressed by the lap licking MSM liberal leaning in the tank MSM.

These two have really cracked the code on how to elect a senator to the presidency which has never been d one before with so little accomplishments before their .

The reason being that Senators usually have long voting records following them around that will usually disqualify them in one way or another from serving/ Long records are the absolute opposite of what these two possess, that's for sure.

The biggest problem the country has is that we on the right already know most of this to the point of even admitting that our own presidential offerings left standing mind you have much to be desired and are certainly not making the grade that many principled conservatives require.

The hard part is getting the attention span deprived I-Phone/XBox, pop culture driven sycophants on the left who are acting and treating this as if this is just another season of American Idol, as opposed to an all important presidential election for the most important job on the face of planet earth besides motherhood of coarse, which remarkably the left also considers to be an absentee ownership position as well thanks to the liberal convenience of abortion that is.

So, here is a great OP ED I read in regards to this incredulous "Magical Mystery "of Hillary and Barack explaining what exactly is exactly going on with the liberal electorate and their amazing absent minded acceptance of these two of the least experienced candidates for president that anyone can recollect in recent times:

This good author Brad McDonald calls it...........

"Abdication Of Reason"

theTrumpet.com: "What can we deduce about the state of mind of those who rally, sometimes with remarkable fervor, behind a man they know nothing about?

Abdication of reason.

In the Emory Wheel, the student newspaper of Emory College, Josh Prywes reported, “Pollster Frank Luntz asked college students at a recent focus group to name the candidate they were going to vote for. All of them said Obama, but when Luntz followed up by asking them to name a single accomplishment of the senator, they couldn’t name one. Nobody could name a single accomplishment that Senator Obama has achieved” (emphasis mine throughout). Can you?

Barack Obama is an unrivaled political sensation, a political phenomenon on pace to become the Democratic nominee for president of the United States.

Senator Obama’s success is spectacular not just for its scale, but for the means by which it has come about. The strategy employed by the Obama campaign, as commentators—including some on the liberal bench—have observed lately, has been one of substituting rhetoric for reason, and style for substance, in an effort to win the hearts of supporters with a syrupy message of change, hope and inspiration. It’s the same style as that adopted by many a Pentecostal preacher, and it seems to be having the same spellbinding results."

"But though the senator’s message of “change” may be enthralling—especially when delivered Obama-style, with a big toothy smile, vibrant body language and the perpetual use of emotionally inclusive language—there is no particular agenda offered for that change, no goal mentioned to hope for, no laid-out strategy. Obama’s message is geared to obtaining one climactic, emotionally inspired action from his enraptured audiences: vote for Obama!

It’s a campaign founded on the abdication of reason in exchange for the embodiment of emotion.

So far, it has worked. In his column last Friday, Charles Krauthammer assembled a disturbing montage of the feverish support behind Senator Obama. Despite the stark contrast “between his broad rhetoric and his narrow agenda,” said Newsweek columnist Robert Samuelson, “the press corps—preoccupied with the political ‘horse race’—has treated his invocation of ‘change’ as a serious idea rather than a shallow campaign slogan. He seems to have hypnotized much of the media and the public with his eloquence and the symbolism of his life story. The result is a mass delusion that Obama is forthrightly engaging the nation’s problems when, so far, he isn’t.”"Keep reading this one, it's good.

---

I Posted Regarding This Sinclair/Obama Story Last Week...

+Ahead of the curve as now this week finally some media outlets are starting to pay a little bit of attention to this sordid tale of which Obama is a main character being accused of gay sex and drug usage with a man by the name of Larry Sinclair. (last weeks post)

However, strangely those charges will probably make Obama even more attractive to the sick and demented liberals who engage in this type of behavior regularly and consider it to be normal for the most part. Part of the reason the MSM is ignoring the story as well is because they would certainly hope their presidential nominee is a homosexual drug user just like they all are for the most part nowadays.

A badge of honor in the sordid sick world of liberalism in America today, anything goes and the more of it the better.

Sleaze charge: 'I took drugs, had homo sex with Obama':

WorldNetDaily Monday"WASHINGTON – The electrifying presidential campaign of Barack Obama faces a new challenge – a Minnesota man who claims he took cocaine in 1999 with the then-Illinois legislator and participated in homosexual acts with him.

When his story was ignored by the news media, Larry Sinclair made his case last month in a YouTube video, which has now been viewed more than a quarter-million times. And when it was still ignored by the media, Sinclair filed a suit in Minnesota District Court, alleging threats and intimidation by Obama's staff.

Sinclair, who says he is willing to submit to a polygraph t"test to validate his claims, will now get his chance – thanks to a website offering $10,000 for the right to record it and $100,000 to Sinclair if he passes.

"My motivation for making this public is my desire for a presidential candidate to be honest," Sinclair told WND by telephone. "I didn't want the sex thing to come out. But I think it is important for the candidate to be honest about his drug use as late as 1999." continued

Looks like that sicko Sinclaire will get at least 10 g's richer as he is going to take the challenge and hopefully pass the polygraph test then earning himself another 90 g's.

Once he does pass which I'm sure he will as no one is stupid enough to lie about such a sick tale as this knowing full well the spotlight will be glaring right down his throat just like Obama apparently was , will then the MSM start questioning Brother Obama about his gay drug and sex buddy?

They sure as hell would be all over it were Obama a republican you can bet. The names Foley and Larry Craig recently come to mind and they aren't running for First Black president like this lying and conniving clown Obama is, so we would expect the media in the name of truth and fairness will excoriate him just as they have the above named conservatives for sordid sexual tales.

---