My Only Memory From Last Night's Debate?

Aside of coarse from the usual endless liberal hyperbolic "We are the World's Saviors" crapola emanating from these two candidate campaigns of "Hope". I keep hoping they will come up with some sort of solid strategy and platforms besides the culture of death and their trusty old Abortion plank.

I guess HOPE only matters for the lucky ones that make it past the abortion window that keeps growing longer and longer thanks to their acceptance of the brutal late term abortions that we cannot seem to get taken off the table. So the unborn have no hope but, what the hell, everyone else can count on Hillary or Barack for Change and Hope. What a crock.

I've personally never seen two presidential candidates with less experience between them that ridiculously continue to claim on the stump to have so much experience in politics, claims that can be disproved with a simple 5 minute google records check that apparently so few liberals are willing to attempt..

It's incredible to me that these candidates have gotten so far on so little when there are literally millions and millions of African American and Female Americans more experienced and qualified to be the president of this great country than these two hyperbole masters.

Both candidates are brutally un-notable senators of minimal Capitol Hill experience, Obama less noteworthy at both the state level and the federal level, so I guess that gives him more of less the one up on experience than Hill (lol) claims to have, or more years of less and less accomplishments to have to disprove.

I personally wasn't aware of the fact that the occasional pillow talk with the at that time "President /Rapist in Chief actually qualified as presidential resume experience, mixed in of coarse with her obligatory absentee landlord senatorial gig up there in New York that the poor residents obliged her with.

Or in Obama's case, that being an Illinois state senator also doing an obligatory self serving stint who actually registered more "present" votes than yea or nay combined for his entire senatorial career in Illinois qualifies as well. It's amazing this is going through the entire primary selection process without being addressed by the lap licking MSM liberal leaning in the tank MSM.

These two have really cracked the code on how to elect a senator to the presidency which has never been d one before with so little accomplishments before their .

The reason being that Senators usually have long voting records following them around that will usually disqualify them in one way or another from serving/ Long records are the absolute opposite of what these two possess, that's for sure.

The biggest problem the country has is that we on the right already know most of this to the point of even admitting that our own presidential offerings left standing mind you have much to be desired and are certainly not making the grade that many principled conservatives require.

The hard part is getting the attention span deprived I-Phone/XBox, pop culture driven sycophants on the left who are acting and treating this as if this is just another season of American Idol, as opposed to an all important presidential election for the most important job on the face of planet earth besides motherhood of coarse, which remarkably the left also considers to be an absentee ownership position as well thanks to the liberal convenience of abortion that is.

So, here is a great OP ED I read in regards to this incredulous "Magical Mystery "of Hillary and Barack explaining what exactly is exactly going on with the liberal electorate and their amazing absent minded acceptance of these two of the least experienced candidates for president that anyone can recollect in recent times:

This good author Brad McDonald calls it...........

"Abdication Of Reason"

theTrumpet.com: "What can we deduce about the state of mind of those who rally, sometimes with remarkable fervor, behind a man they know nothing about?

Abdication of reason.

In the Emory Wheel, the student newspaper of Emory College, Josh Prywes reported, “Pollster Frank Luntz asked college students at a recent focus group to name the candidate they were going to vote for. All of them said Obama, but when Luntz followed up by asking them to name a single accomplishment of the senator, they couldn’t name one. Nobody could name a single accomplishment that Senator Obama has achieved” (emphasis mine throughout). Can you?

Barack Obama is an unrivaled political sensation, a political phenomenon on pace to become the Democratic nominee for president of the United States.

Senator Obama’s success is spectacular not just for its scale, but for the means by which it has come about. The strategy employed by the Obama campaign, as commentators—including some on the liberal bench—have observed lately, has been one of substituting rhetoric for reason, and style for substance, in an effort to win the hearts of supporters with a syrupy message of change, hope and inspiration. It’s the same style as that adopted by many a Pentecostal preacher, and it seems to be having the same spellbinding results."

"But though the senator’s message of “change” may be enthralling—especially when delivered Obama-style, with a big toothy smile, vibrant body language and the perpetual use of emotionally inclusive language—there is no particular agenda offered for that change, no goal mentioned to hope for, no laid-out strategy. Obama’s message is geared to obtaining one climactic, emotionally inspired action from his enraptured audiences: vote for Obama!

It’s a campaign founded on the abdication of reason in exchange for the embodiment of emotion.

So far, it has worked. In his column last Friday, Charles Krauthammer assembled a disturbing montage of the feverish support behind Senator Obama. Despite the stark contrast “between his broad rhetoric and his narrow agenda,” said Newsweek columnist Robert Samuelson, “the press corps—preoccupied with the political ‘horse race’—has treated his invocation of ‘change’ as a serious idea rather than a shallow campaign slogan. He seems to have hypnotized much of the media and the public with his eloquence and the symbolism of his life story. The result is a mass delusion that Obama is forthrightly engaging the nation’s problems when, so far, he isn’t.”"Keep reading this one, it's good.

---