That's right, Congressman Mark Kirk, my representative, just returned the money without being forced by the criminal dems to do so in this state.
A group that was headed by the very crook he's running against who's family bank is mired in scandal so deep, investigators wear waders to the office each day to sift through it all.
Yet he's somehow fit for office under the dem only code of conduct.
Aside from that, Obama owes Goldman Sachs the way I look at it, which means a million in campaign cash, so he'd better get out the slushfund checkbook just like Kirk did, without the media and republicans having to beat it out of him.
So we're going to hound local media like others are doing to cover this Obama situation, especially since they found it so interesting for the Senatorial candidate Kirk, who's running for Obama's abandoned seat that he promised he wouldn't abandon to run for president if elected, his first "maiden lie".
Without Goldman's cash Obama's still sitting in that senate seat, which by the way is a career move which should be forbidden in the future because of Obama and for this reason and this reason only:
That is, once elected to a public office one cannot turn around and run for another higher office while still on the public dime forcing them to resign the seat as is the case in AZ where Joe Arpaio was just elected Sheriff but is being encouraged to run for governor but must resign to do so, which anyone with a consience would do and that goes for republicans as well..
This is something of which every single politician does nowadays, meaning they never give their all to the office because they're always running for re election on our time and dime, every time.
Top Contributors to Barack Obama
OpenSecrets: "This table lists the top donors to this candidate in the 2008 election cycle. The organizations themselves did not donate , rather the money came from the organization's PAC, its individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals' immediate families. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates.Because of contribution limits, organizations that bundle together many individual contributions are often among the top donors to presidential candidates. These contributions can come from the organization's members or employees (and their families). The organization may support one candidate, or hedge its bets by supporting multiple candidates. Groups with national networks of donors - like EMILY's List and Club for Growth - make for particularly big bundlers."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Some rules: No leftwing attacks nor Obama supporters so don't waste you're time & especially mine. All 99% others welcome to have your say.