> Obama Regime Report < Obama Regime Report: People In Britain Fight Google's Street Views & Good For Them

Today's world headlines

Monday, March 23, 2009

People In Britain Fight Google's Street Views & Good For Them

I've written about this a few times and this below is from my last post where one of Britain's hidden Nuclear sub bases was uncovered by Google Earth thus adding it to Jihadding terrorists places to visit in the future, especially with so many of them making Britain their new home....

Yet another example today comes this time from British citizens themselves demanding Google's street view mapping be scaled back if not entirely revamped allowing every single person, business and every government entity who wishes, to opt out of the street level mapping and satellite imagery as this service detail is only of any real use for nefarious purposes.

For instance here are the mapping images of my residence in Buffalo Grove Illinois, as this id the image that comes up right to my kitchen window practically since I live off a main thoroughfare, this is a little invasion of privacy if you ask me and were I given the option I'd have it taken down and may do so now that these Brits have done it..

If an enemy of mine wanted to track me down (likely a lunatic lib blogging troll if was such a person after me as I have no enemies) all they need is my address to see the layout of my property which is admittedly neat the first time you see it on Google Maps, then the novelty wears off and it's quite troublesome and problematic after that in my opinion.

Here's the satellite view of the property and surrounding area as well..

Google Street View forced to remove images -

News, Gadgets & Tech - The Independent:
"Google was forced to remove a photograph of a naked child from its Street View service last night as a row over internet privacy escalated into one about public safety.

The Independent on Sunday alerted the internet search giant after finding the image of the toddler, playing at a family summer picnic in a garden square in north London, captured permanently on the revolutionary mapping system. Britain's privacy watchdog, the Information Commissioner Richard Thomas, is considering an investigation into Google if more images of naked children are found to have been picked up by its cameras and made available to internet users.

Google has had hundreds of requests for images to be removed since it launched Street View on Thursday, including pictures of members of the public leaving sex shops or vomiting in the street. But the pictures of young children suggest the service could be exploited for more sinister purposes.

Last night it also emerged that Tony and Cherie Blair are among hundreds of people who have demanded that close-up photographs of their homes be removed. The Blairs' home in Connaught Square, wes"

Pictures of Downing Street were also taken down, although it is not a private address and the location is photographed by millions of tourists every year.

The images of the children were taken last summer and show a typical scene of garden square life in a quiet side-street.

The IoS is not naming the address for privacy reasons, but the square is just yards from a Cabinet minister's home, although the children are not related to that minister.

The images of the garden square were removed by Google within an hour of the company being informed yesterday. The picture had been found by this newspaper within only 10 minutes, suggesting there could be many similar images on the website.

The Tory MP Edward Garnier said: "The right to privacy, and not to become the victim of some corporation's profit-making activities, is clearly something that needs to be protected. We all have an expectation that our privacy should not be invaded or exploited for commercial purposes."

A spokesman for the Information Commissioner's Office said: "We will consider the IoS story carefully. Images of children must be properly blurred. If there is an underlying problem, for example if what has been uncovered is systemic, then we will take up the matter with Google.

"It is Google's responsibility to ensure all images of adults and children are satisfactorily blurred. Individuals who feel that an image does identify them [and are unhappy with this] should contact Google direct to get the image removed.

"Individuals who have raised concerns with Google about their image being included – and who do not think they have received a satisfactory response – can complain to the ICO."

A spokeswoman for Google said last night: "We will remove these pictures as quickly as possible." She insisted that the pictures had been taken on a public road – although the street is not a thoroughfare. "This is still on the side of a public road. It [the camera] takes pictures at any time, and it [records] a fleeting moment."

Asked whether Google was concerned that there would be other pictures of children, for example outside schools, the spokeswoman said: "Most of the faces are blurred. If they haven't been, parents can hit a button and remove it [the image]. They show what is going on in the street at a particular moment; they are not live."

Google has defended its use of the mapping service, which covers more than 22,000 miles and 25 UK cities, saying that the degree of clarity of the images is no different to those shown in estate agents' literature.

But there are question marks over whether, in reality, an estate agent would be able to take photographs of naked young children playing outside, without being challenged.

In a fresh twist, the Metropolitan Police denied claims by Google that it had been consulted about Street View prior to its launch. A spokesman for Scotland Yard said: "We have not been involved in discussions with Google regarding their product development."

After earlier insisting that "99.99 per cent" of faces featured in Street View were blurred, Google admitted yesterday that this had been a "figure of speech" as it was clear that thousands of people can be identified. "The technique is not totally perfect," the spokeswoman said. "The idea is not to blur every single face, only those that can be clearly identified."

Among faces not obscured was a police officer standing guard outside the London home of Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, which was at the centre of a row over her expenses.

The Blairs' grand Georgian house, with two police officers stationed outside, can still be viewed from an angle, but a close-up image of the property has been removed. A spokesman for the Blairs could not be contacted for comment. Google refused to comment on the Blairs' individual case, but said images were being blacked out at the "user's request".

The company's discomfort was compounded by a former criminal, Michael Fraser, who wrote in The Sun yesterday that Street View was a "gift to criminals".

Germans in the country's northern state of Schleswig-Holstein are threatening to take legal action against Google because of fears that its photographs of the region's towns and streets are in breach of the country's strict privacy laws.

A campaign against the internet giant has been launched from the small provincial town of Molfsee, near Kiel, and is being eagerly watched by dozens of other towns and cities in the region which has a population of close to 3 million.

"We are not going to let this happen," said Reinhold Harwart, Molfsee's conservative mayor. "This is opening people's houses and homes to criminals. All this information is taken back to the United States and being processed. This can't be allowed," he told the IoS.

Similar concerns have been voiced by Marit Hansen, the state's deputy officer in charge of data protection, and by Peter Schaar, Germany's federal data protection chief, who said he has major misgivings about Google Street View. His office is currently investigating the issue.

The campaigners want Google to be obliged to obtain a street permit, similar to those held by vendors and market stall holders, before they take photographs. "We would then have the option of refusing them permission, which is what we would do," Mr Harwart said.

Google's spokesman for northern Europe claims, however, that Germany's streets are public property and that the concern does not need a permit to take pictures. "We are not a tool designed for criminals," a spokesman said.

Google Street View started photographing Germany in 2008 and the company has already taken pictures of many of the country's major towns and cities. Harwart said his campaign planned to sue Google Street View if the concern was found to be in breach of privacy laws.


Share/Bookmark

The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. H. L. Mencken

2 comments:

  1. I've read your other posts about this, Ray. Also, I saw this story reported on Fox today and they had a guest on that claimed that Google is now complying with requests to remove something if it's reported by a homeowner.

    I have to say that I'm an excellent detective and I have been amazed at the amount of information that I can find within only minutes online. Ever since Google started doing this, I've been checking out my home and that of family and friends just out of curiosity. Most live in suburban areas but it's still alarming how much detail is available. My house is surrounded by woods, but you can see the entire layout of my property, where the entrances are, that there is a fence around the entire back yard, the cars in the driveway, that there's a back deck, and there's kiddie stuff in the backyard. Too much info for me.

    Given someone's full name, I usually can find their address out and get an image of their house. I even had to make this an issue last fall at my child's elementary school because some dumbass moms like to take photo's at school events and put them in the tiny local paper with captions with the kids' names. The principal wasn't too happy about it herself, but she was even more alarmed when I showed her what I found in about three minutes online - with the child's full name, I was able to find her address which even if it's a common last name would be easy for a stranger to do because all they would have to do is Google the name of the school to find what town it's in, so the child lives in that town. With that info, I was able to get the full name of both parents, their address and see images of their entire property from all angles. Any sick person could have seen this cute little girl in the paper and done the same thing. Then with that info, they could stake out her house and try to get an opportunity to call her by name, and even mention the names of her mom and dad, posing as a friend.

    It's really insane how much can be found online. I am amazed on a daily basis just how much info people volunteer on their own on public blogs and websites, paricularly mothers of young children. That's why you will never see Maine-Woman and I use our real names, or the names of our husbands and children.

    As far as Google's street view, I wouldn't be surprised if there's a terrible crime one day and the police investigation reveals that the criminal used Google street view to track someone down. It's sad to say, but that's usually what forces change.

    (NJ-Woman)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Escellent comment and I'm with you completely in as far as using a pen name as we don't have the protection and power that famous writers do as if something happens to them it would bring to bear the resources of their huge deep pocketed lawyers and rightfully so.

    I won't let some freaked out left wing loons harass my brother's family or other relatives as well as my clients which is why I stopped linking my business to the blog as I did in the beginning. I divulge this info to freinds like yourselves in emails but that's the extent of it. It's also to protect me as if one of these freaks showed up on my property I'd kill them and I don't want or need that type of situation at this stage of my life.

    You're certainly more netsavvy than many mothers and citizens for that matter which is one of the benefits of serious blogging, the learning that takes place on a minute by minute basis...We are without a doubt the most educated people in America and particularly on the internet, and I say that without a flinch of doubt,

    ANd you final comment is right on, Americans are reactionary people not pro active people and that comes from laziness and poilitical correctness which both as we know have become far too pervasive in this country today which is leading to our rapid decline.

    Thanks for the great comment Jersey I appreciate the input.

    ReplyDelete

Some rules: No leftwing attacks nor Obama supporters so don't waste you're time & especially mine. All 99% others welcome to have your say.

Google
 
Web chicagoray.com
chicagoray.blogspot.com

One last thing...Fair Use, Photoshop Usage, Legal

Statement on Fair Use

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner or may be authorized or licensed for publication at this site only. Permission to copy, republish or reproduce such material must be obtained from the original copyright owner PHOTOSHOP STUFF.....When the photoshops appear on this site they either have my name on them becuase I made them or tweaked an original in which case I link to the original by clicking the pic. Please take all you want, that's why they're here, just leave the name as is like I do, and I would be eternally grateful. Ask and I'll tweak it for your site if you need it... More here


Back To The Page Top