NY Times resident tart that I used to HATE, Maureen Dowd, has now fired off two columns in a row bashing the same as I noted in this post I wrote on Sunday, and is developing a growing pattern on the left of extreme buyer's remorse as the liberal elite are showing cracks amongst their ranks. Smartly they don't want their careers in complete tatters while jumping off this budget created suicide bridge with Obama and his senatorial sycophants, so she sides with John McCain who she also reports went Twittering wild on the senate floor the other day as excerpted below...
Another thing that shows Dowd is striking nerves with lunatic libs showing she must be right, is that she is being internet raped online by Media Matters, who usually reserves such acts for hated conservatives and pundits, Bill O'Reilly being their favorite target.
Of coarse that was until the new target emerged on top as "the new leader of the Republic party" Rush Limbaugh was appointed by the left over the weekend by the Carville / Begala cabal..... yet another liberal lie taking on the truth via the left blogs talking point to truth phenomenon as many of their lies do .
She's also taking it from her own readers comments, which is always good, as the liberal writers then begin to realize and report the nastiest vitriol on the net and in life comes from the far left fascistm radicals and always has.
I wrote that in this lengthy column yesterday about that very issue which appeared on the Chicago Sun Times website as many of my posts do every week.
Stage of FoolsOp-Ed Columnist -- NYTimes.com: If only Shakespeare had known how to Twitter.
There was a bit of King Lear in the scene on the Senate floor, a stormy, solitary John McCain on “this great stage of fools,” as the Bard wrote, railing against both parties and the president in fiery speeches and rapid-fire tweets.
“He’s mad that trusts in the tameness of a wolf, a horse’s health, a boy’s love, or a whore’s oath,” the Fool told Lear.
And he’s truly mad that trusts in the promise of a presidential candidate to quell earmarks.
The 72-year-old senator who seemed hopelessly 20th century when he confessed during the campaign that he didn’t know how to use a computer or send an e-mail has now mastered the latest technology fad, twittering up a twizzard to tweak his former rival.
Before the Senate resoundingly defeated a McCain amendment on Tuesday that would have shorn 9,000 earmarks worth $7.7 billion from the $410 billion spending bill, the Arizona senator twittered lists of offensive bipartisan pork, including:
• $2.1 million for the Center for Grape Genetics in New York. “quick peel me a grape,” McCain twittered.
• $1.7 million for a honey bee factory in Weslaco, Tex.
• $1.7 million for pig odor research in Iowa.
• $1 million for Mormon cricket control in Utah. “Is that the species of cricket or a game played by the brits?” McCain tweeted.
• $819,000 for catfish genetics research in Alabama.
• $650,000 for beaver management in North Carolina and Mississippi.
• $951,500 for Sustainable Las Vegas. (McCain, a devotee of Vegas and gambling, must really be against earmarks if he doesn’t want to “sustain” Vegas.)
• $2 million “for the promotion of astronomy” in Hawaii, as McCain twittered, “because nothing says new jobs for average Americans like investing in astronomy.”
• $167,000 for the Autry National Center for the American West in Los Angeles. “Hopefully for a Back in the Saddle Again exhibit,” McCain tweeted sarcastically.
• $238,000 for the Polynesian Voyaging Society in Hawaii. “During these tough economic times with Americans out of work,” McCain twittered.
• $200,000 for a tattoo removal violence outreach program to help gang members or others shed visible signs of their past. “REALLY?” McCain twittered.
• $209,000 to improve blueberry production and efficiency in Georgia.
“When do we turn off the spigots?” Senator McCain said in his cri de coeur on the Senate floor. “Haven’t we learned anything? Bills like this jeopardize our future.”
In one of his disturbing spells of passivity, President Obama decided not to fight Congress and live up to his own no-earmark pledge from the campaign.
He’s been lecturing us on the need to prune away frills while the economy fizzles. He was slated to make a speech on “wasteful spending” on Wednesday.
“You know, there are times where you can afford to redecorate your house and there are times where you need to focus on rebuilding its foundation,” he said recently about the “hard choices” we must make. Yet he did not ask Congress to sacrifice and make hard choices; he let it do a lot of frivolous redecorating in its budget.
He reckons he’ll need Congress for more ambitious projects, like health care, and when he goes back to wheedle more bailout billions, given that A.I.G. and G.M. and our other corporate protectorates are burning through our money faster than we can print it and borrow it from the ever-more-alarmed Chinese.
Team Obama sounds hollow, chanting that “the status quo is not acceptable,” even while conceding that the president is accepting the status quo by signing a budget festooned with pork.
Obama spinners insist it was “a leftover budget.” But Iraq was leftover, too, and the president’s trying to end that. This is the first pork-filled budget from a new president who promised to go through the budget “line by line” and cut pork.
On “Face the Nation” on Sunday, Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, dismissed the bill as “last year’s business,” because most of it was written last year.
But given how angry Americans are, watching their future go up in smoke, the bloated bill counts as this year’s business.
It includes $38.4 million of earmarks sponsored or co-sponsored by President Obama’s labor secretary, Hilda Solis; $109 million Hillary Clinton signed on to; and $31.2 million in earmarks sought by Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood with colleagues.
(Even Barack Obama was listed as one of the co-sponsors of a $7.7 million pet project for Tribally Controlled Postsecondary Vocational Institutions until he got his name taken off last week.)
And then there are the 16 earmarks worth $8.5 million that Emanuel put into the bill when he was a congressman, including money for streets in Chicago suburbs and a Chicago planetarium.
Blame it on the stars, Rahm, or on old business. But as Shakespeare wrote in “Lear”: “This is the excellent foppery of the world, that, when we are sick in fortune — often the surfeits of our own behavior — we make guilty of our own disasters, the sun, the moon, and the stars.”
Yes, she is holding Obama's feet to the fire, but by liberally quoting King Lear, she is also calling McCain a senile old man.
ReplyDeleteThat's true, and she's partially right but McCain's a lot less senile than Byrd or Kennedy or a few of the other nuts in the senate..
ReplyDeleteshe's at least had the fortitude to reveal that she's getting a little frightened by Obama's off the charts looming financial mess, unlike the other somewhat loyal Americans in her circle and class.
She's a little hot tart, just a liberal one, one of the few babes in that circle if you were to ask me....
However her particular "real" Obama fantasy and crush that I perceive in her writings has been a little strange in my opinion, so for her so start criticizing him is noteworthy to me, as any criticism of the One is a miracle in itself.