|
|
This activism is beyond the pale, and even though this man knew 'damn well' after already being warned that 'this would wreak havoc on society' he essentially decided to say 'screw that and screw them so I can get my name in the Gay Gestapo Hall of Fame . (btw the pic looks like it's from his "Gay Facebook" profile huh? It just seems a little weird for a judge to me)
So in order to facilitate this I'll go flip 7 million voter's votes on their heads" for the second time now..acting like a 'self appointed king' declaring the will of the people 'moot'.
Perhaps we should just give California back to the Bandito's after all, as I believe they're not worth the continuous damage the liberal portions of the state inflict on the rest of our country starting with the Illegal aliens right through their propaganda chokehold on Hollywood and the New York mass media.
It's whack decisions like this that 'fly in the face' of about 90% of the American population that make one wonder, and this liberal argument that "90% of people thought slavery was ok at one time" has no bearing on this.
None. It's not even in the same ballpark, so it doesn't fly here. Societal order has relied on marriage and family since man started walking upright practically, and anyone can see America's recent departure from that paradigm has been our downfall and everyone knows it.
So we're all supposed to 'sit back' and watch a society implode with destructive decadence in order to satisfy and 'normalize' the upside down sexual world and needs of about 3 % of the population?
Fu** that sh**.. Look what that's brought us. Gay Pride parades down main street USA for starters. Thanks but no thanks.. Wait til the whack decisions start coming from the SCOTUS now that this loon Kagen is on board. God help us all [for the millionth time :( !!!]
 New campaign demanding 'gay' Prop 8 judge be booted: "The openly homosexual federal judge in California who overturned the state's constitutional limitation of marriage to one man and one woman ignored a warning from the state's own Supreme Court about the coming chaos of polygamy and incest if same-sex 'marriages' are established and now is the target of an impeachment campaign.
Judge Vaughn Walker, who openly has lived a homosexual lifestyle, yesterday issued an order that the state could not enforce its own constitutional requirement that marriage is between members of the opposite sex only.
The ruling from Walker said 'race and gender restrictions shaped marriage during eras of race and gender inequality, but such restrictions were never part of the historical core of the institution of marriage.'
'Today, gender is not relevant to the state in determining spouses' obligations to each other,' Walker said. 'Gender no longer forms an essential part of marriage.'
'Nullification' – Just say no! Rediscover historic doctrine of resistance to fight 21st-century federal tyranny
His opinion ignored the terse warning in state Supreme Court Justice Marvin Baxter dissenting opinion in the 2008 case affirming same-sex marriage. Baxter warned of the 'legal jujitsu' required to establish same-sex marriage just a few months before California voters passed Proposition 8 and amended the constitution to limit marriage to one man and one woman.
(Story continues)
 Campaign TO IMPEACH 'Gay Gestapo" Prop 8 Judge Vaughn
The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it.
H. L. Mencken
The left is reverting to pre 911 thinking faster than the Twin Towers took to fall down on September 11th 2001 as they seek out more Bush administration people who kept their liberal asses alive for 8 years than they do crazy, rabid Muslims plotting to kill us all with their next attack.......... which is due any day now under the so called leadership of these peacenick morons
 They just can't help but want to extend our constitutional rights to people that neither deserve them nor have earned them and this ninth circuit of appeals is the most dangerous group of activist judges in the land.  Nothing more or less than a bunch of moronic Loons. latimes.com"A 9th Circuit panel says the ex-attorney general violated the rights of citizens held as material witnesses without cause after 9/11. Rights advocates praise the ruling in Abdullah Kidd's case."Then-Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft violated the rights of U.S. citizens in the fevered wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks by ordering arrests on material witness warrants when the government lacked probable cause, a federal appeals court said in a scathing opinion Friday.
In a ruling that said Ashcroft could be sued for prosecutorial abuses, a three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals denied the former attorney general immunity from liability for how he used the material witness warrants in national security investigations.
Members of the panel, all appointees of Republican presidents, characterized Ashcroft's detention policy as "repugnant to the Constitution, and a painful reminder of some of the most ignominious chapters of our national history."
Civil liberties advocates cheered the ruling in the case brought by Kansas-born Muslim convert Abdullah Kidd, saying it spotlighted excesses committed by the Bush administration in the post-9/11 scramble to thwart terrorist plots.
"The court made it very clear today that . . . Ashcroft's use of the federal material witness law circumvented the Constitution," said Lee Gelernt, the American Civil Liberties Union lawyer who argued Kidd's case. "Regardless of your rank or title, you can't escape liability if you personally created and oversaw a policy that deliberately violates the law."
The ruling could allow Kidd's suit for damages to proceed to trial if the government doesn't appeal to a larger 9th Circuit panel or seek Supreme Court review.
A spokesman for Ashcroft, Mark Corallo, didn't return phone calls.
Department of Justice spokesman Charles Miller said: "We will review the court's decision and make a determination in the future as to what the government's next step will be."
Although the ruling denied immunity to Ashcroft, the government would probably be responsible for covering any successful damage claims brought by those found to have been wrongly arrested.
Kidd, a former University of Idaho running back whose birth name was Lavoni T. Kidd, sued Ashcroft after he was arrested at Washington Dulles International Airport en route to a Saudi scholarship program in March 2003.
He was handcuffed, strip-searched and shuttled among interrogations in Virginia, Oklahoma and Idaho before being released 16 days later and ordered to surrender his passport and live with his wife and in-laws in Nevada.
The arrest led to Kidd being denied a security clearance and losing his job with a government contractor.
In his 2005 complaint, Kidd noted that then-FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III, in an appearance before a congressional subcommittee during Kidd's detention, had pointed to his arrest and that of confessed 9/11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed as evidence of government progress in reining in terrorists.
"To this day, the government has never explained why the director of the FBI would tell the United States Congress that the arrest of Mr. al Kidd -- supposedly a witness -- represented one of the government's noteworthy recent successes in the war on terrorism," the complaint stated.
It is unclear how many U.S. citizens were picked up on material witness warrants in the sweep conducted by national security forces after the 2001 terrorist attacks. Like the preventive detention abroad of foreign terrorism suspects and the CIA's "extraordinary rendition" program, in which suspected enemies were whisked from foreign locales to interrogation "black sites," the material witness arrests were conducted in secret.
At least two other prominent Muslim converts are known to have been arrested as supposed material witnesses.
Alleged would-be "dirty bomber" Jose Padilla was detained at Chicago O'Hare International Airport and held for 3 1/2 years without charges before his 2007 conviction in an unrelated terrorism case in Florida.
Brandon Mayfield, an Oregon attorney erroneously connected to the 2004 Madrid train bombings, was also arrested as a material witness and held for two weeks. He was never charged, and has received an apology from the U.S. government as well as a $2-million settlement.
Constitutional law scholars applauded the 9th Circuit decision as affirmation of citizens' rights to be free from illegal detention.
"This is really important," said Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Irvine School of Law. "This is a federal court of appeals saying that what was done here under the material witness statute was clearly a violation of the Constitution -- that it was not protected by prosecutorial absolute immunity." 
Ashcroft can be sued over arrests, appeals court rules (Freakshow 9th Circuit)
The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it.
H. L. Mencken
|
|
