Not all terrorism: Obama tries to change Terror subject With Semantics (Is what it is)

Obama doesn't want you to call Muslim Terrorists acts of terror "Islamic radicalism" but he obviously has no problem at all sending his disciples out to call you, me and other like minded patriots extremists, no he doesn't does he?

So what are we supposed to make of that?

I know what I make of it, and that his this.....

My Way News - Not all terrorism: Obama tries to change subject: "WASHINGTON (AP) - President Barack Obama's advisers plan to remove terms such as 'Islamic radicalism' from a document outlining national security strategy and will use the new version to emphasize that the U.S. does not view Muslim nations through the lens of terrorism, counterterrorism officials say.

The change would be a significant shift in the National Security Strategy, a document that previously outlined the Bush Doctrine of preventive war. It currently states, 'The struggle against militant Islamic radicalism is the great ideological conflict of the early years of the 21st century.'

The officials described the changes on condition of anonymity because the document is still being written and is unlikely to be released for weeks, and the White House would not discuss it. But rewriting the strategy document is the latest example of Obama putting his stamp on U.S. foreign policy, as with his promises to dismantle nuclear weapons and limit the situations in which they can be used.

The revisions are part of a larger effort about which the White House talks openly, one that seeks to change not just how the U.S. talks to Muslim nations, but also what it talks to them about, from health care and science to business startups and education.

That shift away from terrorism has been building for a year, since Obama went to Cairo and promised a 'new beginning' in the relationship between the U.S. and the Muslim world. The White House believes the previous administration based that relationship entirely on fighting terrorism and winning the war of ideas.

'You take a country where the overwhelming majority are not going to become terrorists, and you go in and say, 'We're building you a hospital so you don't become terrorists.' That doesn't make much sense,' National Security Council staffer Pradeep Ramamurthy said."  more

************************************************

No problems identifying Christian Abortion opponents as extremists do they? Nope. Tea Party People? Nope/ Average Americans for that matter? Nope//

Muslims? Different story.

oh oh mister, they'll be none of that here" says Obama. What the fuc?

Liberals and their grammatical gymnastics which always seek to classify people one way or another racially always humor me, as they, through OBAMA  have now determined that the usage of the entirely  innocuous term "Islamic Radicalism" (which does nothing more than accurately identify people of an Islamic belief system who have demonstrated a propensity for extremist behavior) hurts the feelings of the "poor wittle Muswims".

People who mind you seemingly can tolerate just about anything when it comes to misery since the Middle East has no shortage of that, including indiscriminate massacres of their own people by AL Queda on a more than regular basis, but cry rivers of crocodile tears when someone here in America tells them to take their freaking Burkha or turban off  or calls them terrorist sympathizers and the likes

If they didn't support them, they would denounce them, and when they do very rarely reject the "Islamists" if you will, (as they have now in Iraq by embracing western living the way the have finally begun to do), they're massacred like dogs, and not by Americans, but by their own again we've plenty of fresh evidence of this from the blood in the streets of Baghdad which has caused the leadership to ask America not to leave.

Haven't heard that have you? Yes, the media ignored that a little bit this week past.

US officials sought to downplay the possibility that Iraq is sliding toward major sectarian fighting and insisted there were no plans to slow the withdrawal ...

That means exactly the opposite of what they said, I would bet anything. I've heard this much lately and some from soldiers.

This Al Queda attempt at stoking the violence we see over the past week in Baghdad with clarity, as they murdered innocent Iraqi's to foment tribal strife as the people move further and further away from Saddam's despotic and murderous regime, into democracy the "ISLAMIC EXTREMISTS" hate with a passion as much as the liberals do. Furthermore, they have no compunction whatsoever destroying their fellow man, including first and foremost Muslims.

The recent violence, which has largely targeted families and homes, has been reminiscent of the sectarian bloodshed that tore Iraq apart from 2005 to 2007 and prompted the United States to send tens of thousands more troops to the front lines. Read more:

The fact of the matter is; they, Al Queda, kill far more Muslim brethren than have even been killed by coalition forces, in fact the actual numbers indicate it to be about 8 times the amount and US kills are obviously accidental while 'Queda's are intentional,  no matter how much the left lies about the casualty numbers consistently, rendering their observations moot.

A Muslim mother laments the death of her son, killed in Baghdad after a suicide bombing.

This is more useless kowtowing to the Muslim lobbyists who seek to blur the real image of their so called "religion of peace" which is nothing of the sort, and all it takes to disprove the notion is to pick up the damn Koran and read it for yourself. Just look at this one verse and tell me if you think you should trust that next person who's a practicing Muslim:

"Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution (prevention), that ye may Guard yourselves from them (prevent them from harming you.) But Allah cautions you (To remember) Himself; for the final goal is to Allah." Surah 3: 28

Which is something Islamic extremists are betting most Americans are just too damn lazy and many of them simply too stupid to actually do, which they would be absolutely correct in assuming, and that's how they get away with mischaracterizing it as some "religion of love and peace" because it is not.

Christianity is that, and Buddism is that, Islamism is not that and never has been.

One of the few they've made correctly, just like their Chamberlain lite supporters here in the US calling themselves liberal Patriots who wouldn't know the enemy if he or she showed up at their front door looking like this exclaiming "never judge a book by it's cover". What stooges.

---