Drip By Drip The Media Admits Throwing The ElectionTo Obama

Of coarse we bloggers and our readers have known this for w 2 years now and written about it millions and millions of times and now the media is finally cracking, as the the old saying goes, the only way to keep a secret between 3 people is if two of them are dead.

The ACORN FRAUD secret has been out for a long time, and thanks to the recent attention Glen Beck, Bill O'Reilly and others have given the group since it's recent fraud charges in Nevada has refocused the spotlight on the Obama created organization, and so the jig is up and this American Spectator revelation will help raise the noise level for ACORN funding to be out and out revoked.

Not to mention cries for serious investigations that will undoubtedly result in a long line of prosecutions leading to convictions and for the guilty to start going to prison one by one, eventually working towards an ultimate goal of a down the road Obama impeachment for massive unprecedented election fraud orchestrated nationwide on his behalf, riots or no riots.

Here's a picture of a young Obama sowing the seeds of the very voter fraud utilized on a national scale propelling him to a much slimmer victory in November than the left is willing to admit because the fraud involved was likely enough to make the difference in a number of key ACORN juiced states causing the electoral landslide.

Michelle Malkin had a great story about this very thing a that the Times spiked which by the way is where I got the inspiration for the photoshop you see up above that can be read here from set

New York Times Finally Admits It Spiked Obama/ACORN Corruption Story:

"Acknowledging what the blogosphere has known for weeks, the New York Times finally went on record to admit that just before last Election Day it killed a politically sensitive news story involving corruption allegations that might have made the Obama campaign look bad.

But the admission on Sunday, which came seven months after NYT staff reporter Stephanie Strom's reporting about possibly illegal coordination between the Obama campaign and ACORN last year, took the form of a snarky column from Clark Hoyt, the Old Gray Lady's 'public editor.' Hoyt used the word 'nonsense' to describe the allegations of impropriety leveled against ACORN and the Obama campaign.

Hoyt writes in the Sunday New York Times

On March 17, a Republican lawyer, quoting a confidential source for a Times reporter, testified to Congress that the newspaper killed a story last fall because it would have been 'a game-changer' in the presidential election.

The charge, amplified by Bill O'Reilly on Fox News in April and reverberating around the conservative blogosphere, is about the most damning allegation that can be made against a news organization. If true, it would mean that Times editors, whose job is to report the facts without fear or favor, were so lacking in integrity that they withheld an important story in order to influence the election.

I have spent several weeks looking into this issue - interviewing and e-mailing those involved, reading transcripts, looking at campaign finance records and conferring with legal experts. In a nutshell, I think the charge is nonsense.

MORE

---