Chavez went after the oil industry and then the banking industryy and was successful on both fronts, Obama is running down the same road using fear and intimidation to get there. How long before he seeks to install himself indefinitely as Chavez has also done as even the New York Times was appalled enought to write about it? It's already being proposed by this idiot congresssman even before inauguration day!
Now "Obammie the Commie" (my new moniker for the Socialist Chairman) wants to do the same here starting with Citibank, the symbol of capitalism if there ever was one besides the World Trade Centers of coarse, and this "Fascist Grab" is gonna be OK with everyone?
Like all these other moves will just be temporary until it's nursed back to good health?
Yea, I believe that one, just like I believed Obama when he ran for the senate in Illinois on the promise that reiterated at his acceptance speech that he wouldn't abandon the job to run for president (his own words 30 sec. into the video)_We're on the road to communism and Obama must be stopped or The Free America we know is dead.
U.S. Eyes Large Stake in Citi
WSJ.com: "Citigroup Inc. is in talks with federal officials that could result in the U.S. government substantially expanding its ownership of the struggling bank, according to people familiar with the situation.
While the discussions could fall apart, the government could wind up holding as much as 40% of Citigroup's common stock. Bank executives hope the stake will be closer to 25%, these people said.
Any such move would give federal officials far greater influence over one of the world's largest financial institutions. Citigroup has proposed the plan to its regulators. The Obama administration hasn't indicated if it supports the plan, according to people with knowledge of the talks."
When federal officials began pumping capital into U.S. banks last October, few experts would have predicted that the government would soon be wrestling with the possibility of taking voting control of large financial institutions. The potential move at Citigroup would give the government its biggest ownership of a financial-services company since the September bailout of insurer American International Group Inc., which left taxpayers with an 80% stake.
The talks reflect a growing fear that Citigroup and other big U.S. banks could be overwhelmed by losses amid the recession and housing crisis. Last week, Citigroup's share price fell below $2 to an 18-year low. Bank executives increasingly believe that the government needs to take a larger ownership stake in the institution to stop the slide.
Under the scenario being considered, a substantial chunk of the $45 billion in preferred shares held by the government would convert into common stock, people familiar with the matter said. The government obtained those shares, equivalent to a 7.8% stake, in return for pumping capital into Citigroup.
The move wouldn't cost taxpayers additional money, but other Citigroup shareholders would see their stock diluted. A larger ownership stake by the government could fuel speculation that other troubled banks will line up for similar agreements.
Bank of America Corp. said Sunday that it isn't discussing a larger ownership stake for the government. "There are no talks right now over that issue," said Bank of America spokesman Robert Stickler. "We see no reason to do that. We believe the goal of public policy should be to attract private capital into the bank, not to discourage it."
Shareholders' Fears
Citigroup's low share price already reflects, at least in part, a fear among shareholders that their stakes might be further diluted. A government move to take a big stake could backfire, potentially spurring investors to flee other banks, even healthier ones.
There's no universal agreement on what constitutes nationalization of a bank. In the U.K., the government already owns 43% of Lloyds Banking Group PLC, and last week moved to increase its ownership of Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC to 70% from 58%. Those two banks have been classified as "public-sector entities," and as much as £1.5 trillion ($2.136 trillion) of their liabilities have been moved over to the country's balance sheet.
The White House has knocked down recent speculation that the government is preparing to nationalize several large U.S. banks.
The U.S.'s intentions with Citigroup remain unclear. For instance, it's not yet known whether the government would seek a stronger hand in the New York company's management or day-to-day operations.
As part of the plan, Citigroup officials hope to persuade private investors that have bought preferred shares -- such as the Government of Singapore Investment Corp., Abu Dhabi Investment Authority and Kuwait Investment Authority -- to follow the government's lead in converting some of those stakes into common stock, according to people familiar with the matter. That would further bolster an obscure but increasingly pivotal measure of banks' capital known as "tangible common equity," or TCE.
The TCE measurement, one of several gauges of a bank's financial strength, gives weight to common shares -- thus the interest in converting preferred shares to common stock.
Details of the rescue remain in flux. Key questions, such as the price at which the government will convert its preferred stock into common shares, haven't been resolved.
And it's possible that other options will emerge to stabilize the company. For example, the Obama administration could decide to sit tight until the results of several new "stress tests" on major banks -- broad examinations of financial health now being mandated -- are known in a couple months, one official said.
If the deal gets nailed down, it will be Washington's third effort to aid Citigroup since last fall. In October, the Treasury Department put a total of $125 billion into eight giant financial institutions, including $25 billion to Citigroup, in exchange for preferred shares and warrants to buy stock.
Then, shortly before Thanksgiving, the government agreed to infuse another $20 billion into Citigroup as its stock tumbled. It also agreed to protect the banking company against most losses on a $301 billion pool of assets.
Among the question marks looming over the current discussions is the future of Citigroup Chief Executive Vikram Pandit and the company's board. more here
So he masked another issue he was following through with over the weekend...
ReplyDeleteIts the same old bait and switch he's played masterfully through the entire campaign I have to admit. But then again,when the people you're trying to fool are fools themselves its not a hard thing to accomplish.
ReplyDeleteIf they cant recognize the similarities between their boy and the rise of Hitler they're pretty easy to fool over and over.
I guess the banks are already half nationalized . There goes our future generations prospects of making any money. Short selling is the only way to make money in the market now. Or to get a job as a government consultant.
ReplyDeletePretty soon any options of making money with money will all disappear as that's pure capitalism. It reminds me of the last scene in Trading Places as they enter the WTC adn then the trading floor/pits, eerie.
ReplyDeleteAll those things are gone of coarse, and when Akroyd says "this is the last bastion of pure capitalism on this earth" little did we know although Orwell tried to warn us I guess.
We still have time to save it, not much but a little more time and I think these blogs can make a difference as more and more people see the real Obama and put it together with what we warned them all about and they admit 2 plus 2 does = 4.
Here's the other part of that clipthe Trade center shots and the carnage remark
ReplyDelete