All these peaceful philosophical types sitting around contemplating what can we do to make these unruly unmanageable brutes and neanderthals that hate progress and the west love us, "please love us radical Muslims, we love you, you're all just misunderstood, we understand you, trust us.." What a bunch of psycho babbling bullshit.. George Bush's way , which would be my way is finally starting work after 8 years of killing radicals in Sandland and it's the only way they understand. That's why you'll see a MAJOR UPSURGE of attacks now that the hated Bush (hated by radical Muslims and liberals ironically enough) is on the way out.
Here's Deepak Chopra's appeasement answer to the problem caused by everyone and everything except the radical Muslims, listen to him blame Oil, Kashmir, Washington and everything but radicals, it's quite unreal actually:
Nothing short of giving up our way of life for theirs is the easy answer to this problem we face, nothing. These animals aren't interested in peace, love and friendship with the west and getting along with their neighbors, they're interested in returning the world back to caveman and Allah days, and nothing else, period. They say this to the west and they live this day in and day out over and over without remorse or apprehension. Yet most liberals like the man above think they have this mystical power of persuasion and understanding that no one else in the long history of the planet and humanity has ever possessed and never will. They think that these animals can be mesmerized and changed by the likes of smooth talking charlatans like Obama, or again this know it all Muslim mystical self appointed philosopher and appeaser Chopra.
They are unfazed by their coddling if not entirely amused and encouraged by Obama and his ilk, yet still hate (with a passion we don't possess) anyone that's been westernized in their eyes in the least bit including the liberals, and they will fight this westernization 'til the death as these 10 nuts demonstrated in Mumbai. Or at least until they're captured and then coerced in specific ways that the media has now robbed our interrogators of for fear of prosecution and persecution for saving American and western lives as they do daily. They don't respond in our favor to coddling and cuddling like the left had us doing down in Club Gitmo eventually to appease the European liberals and Amnesty International types while these guys sit in the sun plotting , planning and smiling the entire time patiently waiting for that liberal imposed day they're released and can return back to the jihad, which they all do immediately once released.
There are lots of articles today and yesterday written by people much smarter than I that basically feel the same way, and I would suggest reading as many as you have time to do as I have in order to get a better grasp of what these attacks meant and what's in store Americans and the west if the war against terror is given up for some tea party and flowers type approach. An answer that's been used before and will only cause the west to burn like New York did on 911 and The Taj Hotel did a week ago, and you can bet that'll be sooner than later as it's already happening. It's not going to turn the other way after an election of a Muslim apostate and a few summit meetings by people the radicals hate just as much as they hate people like me and others who hate them back...
Here are some of those other conservative media articles:
Blogging buddy Eric at THE TYGRRRR EXPRESS in India Burns, Liberals Plan Tea Parties
Mark Steyn and It’s Not the Cold War
The Wall Street Journal in Deepak Blames America, Yes that same nimrod I show up above
And this one, from Aurthur Herman at NRO called
Lost Illusions
by Arthur Herman on National Review Online: "It’s been fascinating, but also disheartening, to watch the mainstream media completely miss the real story about the 60-hour terrorist rampage in Mumbai, India — which may have killed as many as 300 people, and has certainly injured hundreds more. What died in Mumbai — besides scores of innocent people in their hotel rooms and at the Mumbai Jewish Cultural Center and on the blood-drenched platform at Chatrapathi Sivaji railway terminal — were certain illusions about the war on terror, and how to deal with terrorists.
One of those illusions is about who is fighting whom in the war on terror.
"Many put the blame for the attack on years of Indian-Pakistani hostility and tension. In fact, relations between the two countries have never been warmer. This past month, Pakistan’s new president stunned and delighted Indians by publicly renouncing any first use of nuclear weapons. Violence in Kashmir, the principal bone of contention between India and Pakistan since 1947, is on the decline. Before the Mumbai attacks, politicians were scheduled to start talks on permitting trade across the region’s Line of Control, so that Hindu farmers in Indian Kashmir can sell their wheat or a used tractor to Muslim farmers in Pakistani Kashmir.
This is precisely what the terrorists don’t want, of course. It’s the fact that tensions over Kashmir are diminishing that prompted them to attack on the November 28 — just as al-Qaeda blew up Samarra’s Golden Mosque in Iraq back in 2006 in order to keep Shias and Sunnis hating and killing each other. The illusion that formal agreements between peoples and governments — whether between India and Pakistan or Israel and the Palestinian Authority — can somehow defuse the terrorist problem was the among the first casualties in Mumbai. Terrorists see it the other way around: the relaxation of tensions is a problem requiring bloodshed.
Islamic terrorists don’t want justice or respect for their beliefs, or restoration of some imaginary homeland. They want violence and death. The duty of every government is to make sure that terrorists get them before they can deal them out. Pakistanis will never know peace, or peace with their neighbors in Afghanistan and India, until they finally and ruthlessly root out the terrorists in their midst.
The same goes for India. That was the second illusion that died in Mumbai: that democratic nations can somehow opt out of the war on terror. India has largely operated on that assumption since 2001, even though it is home to the second-largest Muslim population in the world after Indonesia, and wedged between two neighbors — Pakistan and Bangladesh — where Islamic terrorist groups operate in relative freedom. continued
No comments:
Post a Comment
Some rules: No leftwing attacks nor Obama supporters so don't waste you're time & especially mine. All 99% others welcome to have your say.