Obama Childrens Book Full Of Liberal GobbledyGook

This article says about all anyone could say about this ridiculous childrens book that was popped out like Aliens from Sigourney Weaver's shipmate's bellies and I'll let it speak for itself, along with the goofy lib comments that accompany it, not all but many.

Another Barack in the Wall:

American Thinker: "Usually, children's books do not scare me. But I just read a children's book entitled 'Barack' by Johah Winter, with illustrations by AG Ford, published on September 30, 2008 by Katherine Tegen Books, an imprint of Harper Collins Publishers. 'Barack's' dust jacket states that it is for children ages 4-7. This book scared me very much.

I am scared because of what this book will do to my daughter and other children who read it. My little girl is six and a half years of age. I will not allow her to read this book or have it read to her without my being able to explain to her what was omitted from the book. I will be checking with her school teachers for the next five years or so to make sure that she is not exposed to this book without the material that was omitted. To do otherwise would allow my child to become a victim of political deception.

The entertainment value of 'Barack' through an inspirational and abbreviated account of Barack Obama's life leading up to the Presidential election cannot justify the false impression it conveys. 'Barack' will create another battle for parents to fight against a culture that teaches their children so much that is wrong.

The dominant media treated the voters like children by omitting and obfuscating significant information about Obama that would have caused him to lose support. Ronald Kessler of Newsmax.com offers some examples. Mark Halperin of Time magazine stated: "Media bias was more intense in the 2008 election than in any other national campaign in recent history . . . . It's the most disgusting failure of people in our business since the Iraq war. . . . It was extreme bias, extreme pro-Obama coverage." The Washington Post's Ombudsman stated after the election:

The Post provided a lot of good campaign coverage, but readers have been consistently critical of the lack of probing issues coverage and what they saw as a tilt toward Democrat Barack Obama. My surveys, which ended on Election Day, show that they are right on both counts.

continued, this gets better

---