The real interesting part of the choirboy story is that he also claimed to have had gay sex with Obama just as Sinclair has done but yet cannot get anyone to print his claims, until a judge ruled yesterday that his lawsuit against Obama can proceed. I wrote about it then both here and again here
We'll have to keep an eye on the birdie for this BrObama bombshell to really hit the fan as the suit progresses.
A blog I check once in a while that I've posted below has a great overview of the whole saga and puts it all together very nicely for those not familiar with the story as it has unearthed it's self like a slimy dirt and filth covered worm.
Obama’s Dubious Past Goes ‘Mainstream’
SAVAGE POLITICS » Blog Archive » : "Yesterday in Puerto Rico, a bombshell fell on Barack Obama’s hopes to at least win a small percentage of primary votes in said jurisdiction (he was only receiving 20% of support in the polls). This “bomb” goes by the name of Larry Sinclair and his allegations of homosexuality and cocaine use against Barack Hussein Obama, which happened to go ‘prime time’ yesterday throughout the Island.
For those of you who do not know the story, Larry Sinclair is a gay man who claims that ‘when Barack Obama was a member of the Illinois Senate he met twice with Larry Sinclair in November 1999 in Chicago, obtained cocaine for the both of them and consumed it (crack cocaine smoked through a glass pipe in the Senator’s case). On both occasions they also participated in consensual sexual acts with each other.’
After his allegations became known through his Youtube video (WATCH HERE), a website (WhiteHouse.com) offered Larry Sinclair money in exchange for his taking of a polygraph test on their site. On the site, they constantly assured the public that they were going to video-record the proceedings and post it on their website, all in hopes of giving full disclosure of the results. As many of you may remember, this supposed video was never posted/published (never has) and, running late on their own schedule, decided to ONLY post a brief description of the “analysis” of the results (supposedly provided by two independent researchers which claimed that he had failed it). continued
No comments:
Post a Comment
Some rules: No leftwing attacks nor Obama supporters so don't waste you're time & especially mine. All 99% others welcome to have your say.