At first glance , yes. BUT, whenever this paper condemns such a popular liberal cause like the Global Warming freight train of bull, we must take a step back and examine what their true underlying motive could possibly be here, as we know darn well it isn't to discredit Al Gore at the zenith of his whole new existence as Global Warming Czar of the new left wing shadow world order waiting to step in place should they win the White House in '08..No, this maneuver in my opinion is undoubtedly a calculated curveball being thrown by the left PR machine and the paper solely intended to give we, the public, an impression that this ' global warming movement is receiving the usual media watchdog scrutiny and attention applied to all other topics so greatly affecting the US and the world. (yeah right)
In other words, plant a manufactured hit piece in the NY Times to trick all the ignorant righties led by the conservative bloggers who will collectively be so amazed the liberal Times is criticizing Al Gore that it will get bounced around endlessly by blogs like this one and other conservative forums like Free Republic!
Why would they do this? This has a twofold benefit; (a) the paper can try to restore some of it's lost credibility from the Blair and secrets scandals by appearing to attack the left, and (B) to fool skeptics as I said above into thinking that Global Warming theory is being thoroughly vetted from all quarters further down the road lending more credence to the supposed validity of it.
This then plants the seeds of a later printed reversal when they will proclaim that the info for this piece was proven wrong and tainted, being to them by a sneaky right winger who after further investigation turned out to be an employee of Karl Rove, thus casting the Times as a poor "victim" of the vast right wing conspiracy in a totally imaginary scheme devised to again bolster the reps of the Times and the Movement giving their rabid dog blogs something to chew on for a few weeks or so..
Paranoia on my part? Maybe. But any time the NYT attacks the left there's a underlying motive to their actions and it's not to uncover the left you can bet.
From a Rapt Audience, a Call to Cool the Hype -
New York Times: "Hollywood has a thing for Al Gore and his three-alarm film on global warming, “An Inconvenient Truth,” which won an Academy Award for best documentary. So do many environmentalists, who praise him as a visionary, and many scientists, who laud him for raising public awareness of climate change.
But part of his scientific audience is uneasy. In talks, articles and blog entries that have appeared since his film and accompanying book came out last year, these scientists argue that some of Mr. Gore’s central points are exaggerated and erroneous. They are alarmed, some say, at what they call his alarmism."more
HYSTERIA
Exposing the secret agenda behind today's obsession with global warmingThe U.N. recently announced global warming is leading inexorably to global catastrophe. Al Gore won the "best documentary" Oscar for his disaster film "An Inconvenient Truth." The news media beat the drum of "climate catastrophe" daily, all but ignoring scientists who say the threat is overblown or nonexistent.
Skip Ahead
Titled "HYSTERIA: Exposing the secret agenda behind today's obsession with global warming," Whistleblower tells the rest of the story the "mainstream press" will never reveal. read more
No comments:
Post a Comment
Some rules: No leftwing attacks nor Obama supporters so don't waste you're time & especially mine. All 99% others welcome to have your say.