Larry Elder Figures It Out...

He's got a good op-ed that I've posted below that reveals the Democrats' long awaited and self-touted plan for victory in Iraq.

He then goes on to demonstrate how they plan to achieve their goal and the plans' main architect and spokesperson is quoted throughout to bolster his hypotheses.

Both the plan and it's explanation will come as no surprise to most news watchers.

Here's an excerpt

Democrats' plan for victory in Iraq:

WorldNetDaily: "Now it can be told. The Democrats do have a plan for victory in Iraq.

It is as simple as it is brilliant – confuse, confound and surprise the enemy."

(Voting for the joint resolution to give Bush authority to use force against Saddam Hussein was) the hardest decision I've ever had to make, but I cast it with conviction. I want this president, or any future president, to be in the strongest possible position to lead our country, at the United Nations or at war.– Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., Oct. 10, 2002


But didn't the House just vote on a resolution opposing the president's plan to increase troop levels in Iraq? And didn't all of the Democratic senators – in office at the time – now running for president also vote for the 2002 joint resolution authorizing the war? Yet, all of these senators now support some form of withdrawal by a date certain. Talk about keeping our enemies off-balance.

What I have said is that I do think we need more troops. –– Sen. Clinton, Dec. 7, 2003

But didn't the Senate vote unanimously – 81 to 0 – to confirm Gen. David Petraeus as the new top military commander in Iraq? And doesn't Patraeus support the president's plan to increase the troop levels, calling this "surge" necessary to achieve our objectives? Yet the very same Democrats – with some Republicans – who voted for Patraeus oppose the plan to achieve his and the president's stated objectives. Right now, somewhere in Iraq, a confused al-Qaida sympathizer must be saying, "No government could be that dysfunctional."

(Column continues)

click to see more typical conflicting quotes from typical Democrat Queen Hillary who like many other Dems (John Kerry for one) seems to be "for the war before they were against the war", or "against the war before they were for the war", or something like that.

Or is it "for the troops but against the war", I sometimes get confused too. I'm sure our enemies aren't forgetting these statements .

---