Shocker, Not: Obama Administration Earns an 'F' on Stopping WMD Attacks

They can't keep double agent Islamic killers out of the ranks of the military, how the hell can they be expected to have the WMD situation under control?

This commission established by congress says today they can't and get an "F" for the effort.

Newsmax - "The national WMD commission established by Congress has given the Obama administration an 'F' for failing to protect America from nuclear, chemical, and biological attacks.

'Nearly a decade after 9/11, one year after our original report, and one month after the Christmas Day bombing attempt, the United States is failing to address several urgent threats, especially bioterrorism,' stated former Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla., chairman of the bipartisan Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism.

The report charges the administration 'is simply not paying consistent and urgent attention to the means of responding quickly and effectively so that [WMD attacks] no longer constitute a threat of mass destruction.'

Surprisingly, the Commission concluded there still exists 'no national plan to coordinate federal, state, and local efforts following a bioterror attack, and the United States lacks the technical and operational capabilities required for an adequate response.'"  continued

Then the former head of WMD has this to say this morning on the Al Queda objectives and the fact that their patience should not be misconstrued as a nod to the efforts to keep them quiet, which were great until Jan 20th 2009.

A new report by retired longtime intelligence officer Rolf Mowatt-Larssen, who served as chief of the CIA’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Department, accuses the U.S. government of seriously misreading al-Qaida’s operational objectives.

“Al-Qaida’s reasoning,” according to Mowatt-Larssen's new report from Harvard’s Kennedy School, “runs counter to analytic convention that equates the ease of acquisition of chemical, biological or radiological weapons with an increasing likelihood of terrorist use — i.e., a terrorist attack employing crude weapons is therefore more likely than an attack using a nuclear or large scale biological weapon.” more

Related articles by Zemanta

• Panel: US not ready for bioterrorist attack (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• Obama to Announce Plan to Respond to Bioterrorism (abcnews.go.com)
• U.S. not doing enough to avoid terrorism: report (cbc.ca)
• WMD Report Card: Government Failing to Protect America from Grave Threats of WMD Proliferation and Terrorism (eon.businesswire.com)

---