Opportunistic OTH Woman Files Ridiculous Lawsuit To Get Rich

My first question is what is a 50 plus year old woman doing wearing thongs in the first place as the plaintiff in this frivolous lawsuit is? Personally I cant see how any women wear these I've been told most uncomfortable piece of undergarments, and even worse, out in public view on the beaches or pools everywhere like the behemoths pictured below other than to avoid those dreaded tan lines that lord knows they can't live with at any cost..., (sarcasm off)

(then on again..lol) How dreaded an issue to have to deal with ahead of gas prices and all the other insignificant things going on in the world today. What a tough life this plaintiff must be living to have time to worry about such things other than of coarse being a lazy slug who goes through life awaiting an opportunity like this to get rich off of others like this obviously is. (now off)

This lawsuit is the poster child for automatic reverse judgments being entered against the frivolous cash seekers like this woman obviously is should they lose or have the case thrown out.

My bet is she looks a lot more like these eyesores below

click to enlarge

Dinged By A G-String? -

June 17, 2008: "JUNE 17--As she was attempting to put on a Victoria's Secret thong, a Los Angeles woman claims that a decorative metallic piece flew off the garment and struck her in the eye, causing injuries and a new product liability lawsuit against the underwear giant. Macrida Patterson, 52, alleges that she was hurt last May by a defective 'low-rise v-string' from the Victoria's Secret 'Sexy Little Thing' line, according to a lawsuit filed last week in Los Angeles Superior Court.

A copy of her June 9 complaint, which does not specify monetary damages, can be found below. Patterson's lawyer, Jason Buccat, told TSG that a 'design problem' caused the decorative piece to come loose and strike Patterson in the eye, causing damage to her cornea. He added that the eye injury, which caused Patterson to miss a few days of work, will be 'affecting her the rest of her life.' Patterson is a traffic officer with L.A.'s Department of Transportation.

Prior to the lawsuit's filing, Victoria's Secret officials asked to examine the garment and the decorative piece, but that request was rejected by Patterson's counsel. For those unfamiliar with 'v-strings,' the undergarment is the Victoria's Secret variant on the 'g-string,' which has long been favored in the battle against visible panty lines"

---