The Peter Paul case is getting new life as the full length Hillary Uncensored Movie has been out now for a few weeks, and the trailer before it was as most know the most viewed video on google and youtube.
This movie and internet buzz was craftily created and released in time for leading up to the legal review now being requested by Paul to the California Supreme Court, which is described in full with great detail in a WorldNetDaily article this morning excerpted below along with the trailer itself for fun viewing seeing the nail that might finally bring down the Clinton's just in the nick of time.
This movie and internet buzz was craftily created and released in time for leading up to the legal review now being requested by Paul to the California Supreme Court, which is described in full with great detail in a WorldNetDaily article this morning excerpted below along with the trailer itself for fun viewing seeing the nail that might finally bring down the Clinton's just in the nick of time.
Hillary's alleged abuse of 1st Amendment appealed:
WorldNetDaily: "California's Supreme Court has been asked to hear a claim Sen. Hillary Clinton wrongly invoked First Amendment protections to remove herself as a defendant from a multi-million-dollar lawsuit in which she and her husband are accused of defrauding the largest donor to her 2000 Senate campaign.
Business mogul Peter Franklin Paul – who claims former President Bill Clinton destroyed his entertainment company to get out of a $17 million agreement – is petitioning the state high court to rehear a recent appeals court ruling upholding a decision to remove the New York Democrat from the case."
"Business mogul Peter Franklin Paul – who claims former President Bill Clinton destroyed his entertainment company to get out of a $17 million agreement – is petitioning the state high court to rehear a recent appeals court ruling upholding a decision to remove the New York Democrat from the case. The California Supreme Court, in 2004, already upheld a lower-court decision to deny the Clintons' motion to dismiss the case.
Regardless of whether or not Sen. Clinton is a defendant, she will be required to testify under oath along with her husband and a host of Hollywood luminaries Paul says were witnesses to a broken deal. A trial originally was scheduled for March this year but was delayed due to the appeal of Sen. Clinton's dismissal."continued
No comments:
Post a Comment
Some rules: No leftwing attacks nor Obama supporters so don't waste you're time & especially mine. All 99% others welcome to have your say.