It has caused the British education system to issue an edict to have to prerequisite any showings of Al Gore's propaganda piece in any schools whatsoever with a long 11 point disclaimer that deems it what it is, a political piece of garbage full of enough inaccuracies to make Micheal Moore gain a few pounds.
They must inform the students of the following: (from the newsbusters post)
In order for the film to be shown, the Government must first amend their Guidance Notes to Teachers to make clear that
- The Film is a political work and promotes only one side of the argument.
- If teachers present the Film without making this plain they may be in breach of section 406 of the Education Act 1996 and guilty of political indoctrination.
- Eleven inaccuracies have to be specifically drawn to the attention of school children.
Now let's see if a court in America can manage this when some industrious American tries to keep this garbage out of our schools too. After all, the liberal members of the Supreme Court are the ones that want our courts to recognize international law, remember that don't you?
Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth
NewsBusters.org: "Here's something American media are virtually guaranteed to not report: a British court has determined that Al Gore's schlockumentary 'An Inconvenient Truth' contains at least eleven material falsehoods. It seems a safe bet Matt Lauer and Diane Sawyer won't be discussing this Tuesday morning, wouldn't you agree?"For those that haven't been following this case, a British truck driver filed a lawsuit to prevent the airing of Gore's alarmist detritus in England's public schools.
According to the website of the political party the plaintiff, Stewart Dimmock, belongs to (ecstatic emphasis added throughout, h/t Marc Morano): continued there
No comments:
Post a Comment
Some rules: No leftwing attacks nor Obama supporters so don't waste you're time & especially mine. All 99% others welcome to have your say.