New Book Blames 9-11 On The Left

More and more people it appears are coming to their senses and realizing what we on the right have been saying for quite some time might actually be correct; that terrorism is aided and abetted greatly by those liberals moping around our country from coast to coast blaming the worlds ills on George Bush and America instead of the real culprits, which are usually anything and everything but those two reasons, starting with the moral decay of the left and Hollywood..

Last week I blogged about an "indictment from the left of the left" phenomenon published in that notorious left wing newsrag LA Slimes, who by the way I have featured later in this post, blames the US for over reacting about 9-11, and now a book blaming the left for the terrorists' emboldening of today.

If more of these types of books get published and read the liberals will finally understand that their moral decadence, emanating from Hollywood and outward, is just as much if not more responsible for the world disliking us and our values (the morals the world perceives we all here must have because Hollywood says so with their work, but we all do not) in the filth that they foist upon the world in America's name than anything else.

Critic Blames Terror on Movie Stars, Activists - Newsweek "Feb. 5, 2007 issue - In 2004, when Sen. Ted Kennedy was temporarily grounded by the appearance of a certain 'T. Kennedy' on the No-Fly List, it was treated as an amusing bureaucratic snafu. But is it possible the government was on to something? Dinesh D'Souza, the right-wing author and critic, has made his own list, and Ted Kennedy is the very first name. D'Souza identifies more than 100 people and organizations as part of a 'domestic insurgency' that is 'working in tandem with [Osama] bin Laden to defeat Bush.' Among them are such well-known terrorists as Sharon Stone, Henry Louis Gates and Cindy Sheehan. "

How about that? In addition, this past weekend the LA Slimes brings us this gem of an editorial from Sunday's rag birdcage edition:|

Was 9/11 really that bad?

Say WHAT?

Was 9/11 really that bad? - Los Angeles Times: "IMAGINE THAT on 9/11, six hours after the assault on the twin towers and the Pentagon, terrorists had carried out a second wave of attacks on the United States, taking an additional 3,000 lives. Imagine that six hours after that, there had been yet another wave. Now imagine that the attacks had continued, every six hours, for another four years, until nearly 20 million Americans were dead. This is roughly what the Soviet Union suffered during World War II, and contemplating these numbers may help put in perspective what the United States has so far experienced during the war against terrorism.

It also raises several questions. Has the American reaction to the attacks in fact been a massive overreaction? Is the widespread belief that 9/11 plunged us into one of the deadliest struggles of our time simply wrong? If we did overreact, why did we do so? Does history provide any insight?" read more

Let's see, What Does history and common sense say about being attacked and turning the other cheek over and over again? You will get attacked again and again and again. That's what history both distant and recently says about that.

Here's what John Gibson from Fox News said Monday afternoon, which is where I even caught this commentary that slipped by me Sunday, as the LA Slimes is right below the NY Slimes on my reading list.....

John Gibson's My Word
Filed Under Dimwit Dems, Loony Libs, September 11,

---