Thats is the answer to the question that is asked in the headline below. The left proports to be the champions of all poor, disenfranchised, neglected etc etc.
The reason they are in need of so much assistance in the first place is liberalism, teaching from a very young age and on throughout their lives to rely on someone or something else to take care of your needs if you cannot or will not try hard enough.
It is yet to have worked to sustain civilization yet, and it will always remain that way. The poor and needy will however always be taken care of and not forgotten by conservatives when appropriate, as is evidenced in the book written and article about it below as well as many statistics proving the left gives much less and bitches much more. Not as a safety net always there as the left wishes it to be, the nanny state as a disincentive to achieve things for ones-self .
The reason they are in need of so much assistance in the first place is liberalism, teaching from a very young age and on throughout their lives to rely on someone or something else to take care of your needs if you cannot or will not try hard enough.
It is yet to have worked to sustain civilization yet, and it will always remain that way. The poor and needy will however always be taken care of and not forgotten by conservatives when appropriate, as is evidenced in the book written and article about it below as well as many statistics proving the left gives much less and bitches much more. Not as a safety net always there as the left wishes it to be, the nanny state as a disincentive to achieve things for ones-self .
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES :: Other Views :: Why are conservatives more generous to poor?: "So what are we to make of the fact that conservative Americans donate 30 percent more to charity than liberal Americans? A new book called Who Really Cares, by Syracuse University professor Arthur Brooks, is not going to please the Howard Dean crowd. The book states flat-out that religious Americans who vote Republican are far more likely to be generous to the downtrodden than secular-progressives.
The big question, of course, is why? Liberal philosophy is all about ''nurturing'' people who need help. The ''tax the rich'' crew can't yell loud enough that more money needs to go to Americans in need. Just not their money.
That may be unfair but probably is not. The cornerstone of liberal economic thought is ''income redistribution,'' that is big government taking assets from the affluent through taxation and giving said assets to the less well off through entitlements like subsidized health care, housing, educational scholarships and the like. The left is also big on imposed ''economic justice,'' things like guaranteed wages and lifetime job security." read more
Filed Under Miscellaneous Commentary
No comments:
Post a Comment
Some rules: No leftwing attacks nor Obama supporters so don't waste you're time & especially mine. All 99% others welcome to have your say.