For whatever reason these women had chosen to have an abortion for, is it necessary for them to proudly walk around and sign their names to a magazine sponsored and published petition declaring themselves as such? First of all who the hell really cares, just like the broadcasting of ones sexual orientation, something that should remain private and not needlessly telegraphed out to the world. When abortions have become something to be proud of we may have begun to have lost all hope for future civilization.
In the article below, one proud "mommy" declares she had an abortion to avoid having to raise a child that may possibly have had Downes Syndrome. This lady already has a 5 year old child and is now trying to get pregnant AGAIN. What happens to the next one if it has a cleft palate? Or is missing a foot, toe, finger who knows. I guess he or she will just get flushed down the memory hole too. In those cases where the mother's health may be jeopardized or the rape cases where they may be justified that is a bit of a different story. But selective abortion based on the baby's potential shortcomings is a bit gruesome.
Will they leave an empty chair at the dinner table for little "might have been" Johnny or Susie at holidays? Why not. When the child that made it past the abortion clinic asks where here brothers and sisters are, mommy can show her this edition of MS Magazine she has framed over the fireplace mantle to explain.
What a sorry sad state the world comes to when women now select what kind of child they wish to have, and if they aren't up to snuff or pretty enough, just flush em down the toilet with a $500-$1000 abortion. Seems like something the Nazi's would have really loved.
Wednesday, Ms Magazine needed to enlist the help of their readership to slant AOL poll results regarding their upcoming article features in the above posting. They are so desperate to make sure the results show in their favor they sent emails to democratic underground to effect the results of the poll and the AOL article accomanying it that can be found below. At the time of this posting the results were as follows:
In the article below, one proud "mommy" declares she had an abortion to avoid having to raise a child that may possibly have had Downes Syndrome. This lady already has a 5 year old child and is now trying to get pregnant AGAIN. What happens to the next one if it has a cleft palate? Or is missing a foot, toe, finger who knows. I guess he or she will just get flushed down the memory hole too. In those cases where the mother's health may be jeopardized or the rape cases where they may be justified that is a bit of a different story. But selective abortion based on the baby's potential shortcomings is a bit gruesome.
Will they leave an empty chair at the dinner table for little "might have been" Johnny or Susie at holidays? Why not. When the child that made it past the abortion clinic asks where here brothers and sisters are, mommy can show her this edition of MS Magazine she has framed over the fireplace mantle to explain.
What a sorry sad state the world comes to when women now select what kind of child they wish to have, and if they aren't up to snuff or pretty enough, just flush em down the toilet with a $500-$1000 abortion. Seems like something the Nazi's would have really loved.
BREITBART.COM - Women Sign "We Had Abortions" Petition: "At a pivotal time in the abortion debate, Ms. magazine is releasing its fall issue next week with a cover story titled 'We Had Abortions,' accompanied by the names of thousands of women nationwide who signed a petition making that declaration.
The publication coincides with what the abortion-rights movement considers a watershed moment for its cause. Abortion access in many states is being curtailed, activists are uncertain about the stance of the U.S. Supreme Court, and South Dakotans vote Nov. 7 on a measure that would ban virtually all abortions in their state, even in cases of rape and incest.
'All this seems very dire,' said Eleanor Smeal, president of the Feminist Majority Foundation, which publishes Ms.
'We have to get away from what the politicians are saying,' she said, 'and get women's lives back in the picture.'"
How about the lives of the unborn child you stupid selfish &*#$(*& .....If you don't want a child don't get pregnant..problem solved without the murder of an unborn baby because it may cramp your on the go lifestyle, or whatever lame reason you can think of.
Wednesday, Ms Magazine needed to enlist the help of their readership to slant AOL poll results regarding their upcoming article features in the above posting. They are so desperate to make sure the results show in their favor they sent emails to democratic underground to effect the results of the poll and the AOL article accomanying it that can be found below. At the time of this posting the results were as follows:
| What do you think of Ms. magazine's listing of womenwho had abortions? | |
| It's a bad idea | 50% |
| It's a good idea | 25% |
| I have mixed feelings | 25% |
| Total Votes: 129,135 | |
| Note on Poll Results | |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Some rules: No leftwing attacks nor Obama supporters so don't waste you're time & especially mine. All 99% others welcome to have your say.