He like everyone else on the right and in the right for that matter wonders aloud what the F&*@ is wrong with the other half of the country who thinks this war against terrorism is some kind of political tool being used by the Bush administration for whatever the reason de jour is over there in looneyleft land.
This thing is for real and the free world is at peril while these folks decide whether they are going to get on board or continue to carry water and be the most useful of idiots for the side of the terrorists. I say either climb aboard right now or get the hell out of the way you friggin traitors =, cause we're gonna fight all youand these mothers 'til the end. Here's what Ed Koch has to say:
This thing is for real and the free world is at peril while these folks decide whether they are going to get on board or continue to carry water and be the most useful of idiots for the side of the terrorists. I say either climb aboard right now or get the hell out of the way you friggin traitors =, cause we're gonna fight all youand these mothers 'til the end. Here's what Ed Koch has to say:
World Tribune.com -- 'Somthing terribly wrong' about aiding enemies in time of war
Why do so many Americans refuse to face the fact that our country is at war with international terrorism?
The leading terrorist group, Al Qaida, is fighting us on the ground in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Both Iran and North Korea are threatening nuclear war. And yet many Americans, including some Congressional Democrats, denounce President Bush, and in so doing, weaken our country’s ability to resist Islamic fascism. One Congressional Democrat, John Conyers of Michigan, announced his intention to impeach the President when Republicans lose control of both Houses of Congress.
There is something terribly wrong with people seeking to demean and weaken the president in war time, thereby strengthening our country’s enemies. As a result of the language and tactics of those opposed to our presence in Iraq, our enemies have been emboldened, believing the American public to be sharply divided on the war, and in fact at war with itself. To other countries, Americans appear pitted against one another not in an election, but in a verbal bloodbath, convincing the world we are impotent — a paper tiger.
The tyrannical forces in Iran led by its president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, make clear that if they can destroy us, they will. Ahmadinejad has said about the U.S., “…Is it possible for us to witness a world without America and Zionism?...you had best know that this slogan and this goal are attainable, and surely can be achieved…” Ahmadinejad has also stated his goal of destroying the state of Israel several times, saying, “…Israel must be wiped off the map.”
If a sovereign nation makes such threats, do those who are threatened have to wait until the missiles are in the air before taking action? Or may threatened states defend themselves with preemptive action?
The U.N. Security Council has demanded that Iran stop developing nuclear technology leading to the creation of a nuclear bomb. Iran has refused, notwithstanding threatened sanctions. Iran’s conventional missiles can already reach Europe and Israel. Must Israel wait until the world knows exactly when Iran’s bomb has been built? read more
No comments:
Post a Comment
Some rules: No leftwing attacks nor Obama supporters so don't waste you're time & especially mine. All 99% others welcome to have your say.