Liberals Cry Foul When The Truth is Told

For once since 9-11 a stalwart mainstream media member has chosen to try and tell the truth about 9-11, and what do they recieve in return? The wrath of the boo hoo bbbwwwaaaahhhhaaa lib blogs along with a cast of other reliable assorted nuts booing and hissing that they are not towing the company line.

That is not to mention the attempt of no less then Bill Clinton himself trying to persuade ABC television to alter and rewrite the miniseries portraying he and his complicit derelict administration in a more favorable light. In other words lie to the public as he and his followers always do when the facts do not support their agenda or mistakes made while they were supposedly steering the ship.

This was blogged about here a few days ago and talked about at length on conservative talk shows and blogs around the same time, all referenced in my post, but just today the New York Terrorist Slimes has just awoken to the wails of their readership by using their newsprint real estate extolling the cries of the liberal truth burial jamboree. Mind you these are the same folks that are still insisting that their beloved ex- president did nothing wrong prior to that fateful day while the terrorists plotted and planned 9-11, all during the laxidasical final months if not years of his x rated slime filled presidency.

They would prefer to have us believe that the terrorists all got together in the final weeks of the summer of 2001 and decided to hijack a few planes for the hell of it, just to make that goofball new president look bad.

9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased - New York Times: "SAN FRANCISCO, Sept. 5 — Days before its scheduled debut, the first major television miniseries about the Sept. 11 attacks was being criticized on Tuesday as biased and inaccurate by bloggers, terrorism experts and a member of the Sept. 11 commission, whose report makes up much of the film’s source material.

The six-hour miniseries, “The Path to 9/11,” is to be shown on ABC on Sunday and Monday. The network has been advertising the program as a “historic broadcast” that uses the commission’s report on the 2001 attacks as its “primary foundation.”

On Tuesday, several liberal blogs were questioning whether ABC’s version was overly critical of the Clinton administration while letting the Bush administration off easy.

In particular, some critics — including Richard A. Clarke, the former counterterrorism czar — questioned a scene that depicts several American military officers on the ground in Afghanistan. In it, the officers, working with leaders of the Northern Alliance, the Afghan rebel group, move in to capture Osama bin Laden, only to allow him to escape after the mission is canceled by Clinton officials in Washington."

In a posting on ThinkProgress.org, and in a phone interview, Mr. Clarke said no military personnel or C.I.A. agents were ever in position to capture Mr. bin Laden in Afghanistan, nor did the leader of the Northern Alliance get that near to his camp.

“It didn’t happen,” Mr. Clarke said. “There were no troops in Afghanistan about to snatch bin Laden. There were no C.I.A. personnel about to snatch bin Laden. It’s utterly invented.”

Mr. Clarke, an on-air consultant to ABC News, said he was particularly shocked by a scene in which it seemed Clinton officials simply hung up the phone on an agent awaiting orders in the field. “It’s 180 degrees from what happened,” he said. “So, yeah, I think you would have to describe that as deeply flawed.” read more

---